Wednesday, 24 April 2013
PEOPLE
RESPECT ME BUT DON’T VOTE ME- S.S.MANN
Mr. Simranjit Singh Mann is an odd man out not only in the Sikh but the whole the lndian politics. Mann who has had long innings in the jails is a principled man. His politics emanate from his faith. He believes cheap tactics are a sin. Surprisingly he is there where he was 15 years ago but at times emits gloomy notes of passism. He complains the people are not supporting him but in the second breath he says that in politics such occasions do come. Mann won landslide victory in 1989, Parliamentary elections from Taran Taran with a record margin over his opponent. ln those elections security deposits of many Akali Dal (Badal) and Congress (l) candidates were forfeited. Mann was not allowed entry in the Parliament because of his insistence on taking of sword inside. He expected that the Sikhs would support him for the principled stand he stood. But in the elections that followed Mann's party was thoroughly routed. Today he has no representative in the Parliament while in the 117 member Punjab Assembly his party the Akali Dal (Amritsar) has only one seat. While we believe that it is his ideology which has repeatedly been rejected by the Punjabis but this Mann is yet to take home the idea. He says that this type of phenomenon takes place in the politics.
ln 1994 the master manoeuvrer of the Sikh politics Jathedar G.S. Tohra spread a net in which the Mann was also caught and the Amritsar Declaration was signed which Tohra later deserted leaving Mann trapped in the web. Today both Tohra and Barnala shirk from the very mention of Amritsar declaration while Mann takes pride in it.
The Mann who does not disown even the militants believes that the Sikhs are not a sovereign power in the lndian system though he himself sticks to the sword and prefers to remain out of the Parliament. What ever his ideology, it appears he is destined to repeat 1989 sometime in the future. This is at least evident from the support he received at his Fill the SYL Canal Morcha'.Today Mann has picked up the thread of Punjab's demands exactly from the point Badal had abandoned it in 1984. lf the Centre did not strengthen Badal's hands, it is quite apparent the next Assembly elections will virtually be contested between two brothers -in-law, Mann and Amrinder of Congress.
Punjab Monitor in an interview with Mann has tried to probe his mind to find that he is standing where he was 15 years ago and is rather more spirited now despite having been ignored by the Sikh masses earlier. (March 1999)
Q- You say
that you observe the Central code, but are you aware that SGPC under the
leadership of Mr. Tohra had altered the colour of Nishan Sahib, the Sikh flag.?
Mann - No, I
have no idea of that, I do not pay attention to small things.
Q- Changing
of flag, is it a small thing ?
Mann - No.
It is important, It is our national flag, but I have not deeply probed the
issue.
Q-Today the
meaning of entire concept of Sikhism are being changed to make it a ritualistic
dominated religion. Does your party has any thing to counter the disinformation
campaign launched by some of the sects ?
Mann - Primarily
it is the job of SGPC whereas we are a small number; just five members in SGPC.
We do keep questioning.
Q-Today what
a few leaders of Sikh's say becomes a code notwithstanding it may be violating the
basic tenets of Sikhism. Your comments?
Mann - The
Sikhs are lapsing into Brahmanism.
Q - Does
your party has any programme to correct it ?
Mann - We
our selves are not observing any rituals, that is all.
Q - But who
will correct it all ?
Mann - A
strong leadership can do it, while we are in a hopeless minority.
Q-For this
you can't blame the masses. That shows how popular the leader is ?
Mann - I
have tried my best to attract the masses. They respect me a lot. The love me but
they don't vote me.
Q-Don't you
think that the masses don't approve your
ideology?
Mann - No,
there is nothing wrong with the ideology, rather the difference on how to break
the shackles of political slavery .
Q-In the
early eighties there was a high sense of awareness among the Sikhs to which we
perhaps could not give any kind of right direction. Have we not failed here? .
Mann - No we
did not have the complete strength to upset the upper card . Because of
limitations we did not had generals like, Mountbattens, etc. It was crushed,
just like the ones in Czechoslovakia, Hungary.....
Q-We are not
referring to the militancy. We are talking about sense of belonging which had
emerged among the Sikhs in those days ?
Mann - Yes,
but the militancy was the main propellant of the masses and the militancy could
not succeed due to reason I have told to you. The peaceful Protest had no importance
in those days. Political decisions were taken on the gun point and not decided politically.
Q-So it was
crushed pushing the movement back to l0 years 50 years ?
Mann - Yes
it happens. There are sometimes gains, sometimes losses. See now we have a mandate.
Yet Badal Sahib is not prepared to accept the Anandpur Sahib resolution that the
Sikhs are a separate nation. In 1947 we were being offered it all but Master
Tara Singh and Baldev Singh refused to accept it. So when there is a ripe
movement the leadership does't want and when it is not possible they cry for
it.
Q-Don't you
now feel that it is the high time we separate our politics from religion ?
Mann - No.
we can't do that. See recently there was a debate in the Parliament on the imposition
of President's rule in Bihar-which is a Hindu state and you saw the assembly split
into two. When it is question of President's rule in the Punjab the whole assembly
is united for it. So you can't separate religion from the politics.
Q-What is
your opinion about the renegade Sikhs or corrupt people who find their entry to
SGPC ? Should something be not done to correct it ?
Mann - SGPC
is a democratic institution. The Sikhs were the first people to tread on the republican
path. It is not the fault of SGPC' It is our leadership which is responsible
for it. We have failed to lay democratic practices in the working. See Nehru
was a leader with a vision, he for example tolerated the voice of dissent and
it is on these traditions that the Indian democracy is working. We Sikhs were first
to start a democratic institution but our leadership has been illiterate which
never valued opposition. Our literate and intellectuals are also to be blamed
because they did not offer for the service. Thus the blame lies with the
leadership not with the institution. The Sikhs lacked a leader of the vision of
Nehru or Jinnah. I would praise Nehru for his tolerance of voice of dissent
though was restricted for his own community (nation) as he ruthlessly crushed dissent
elsewhere for example Nagas, Sikhs etc.
Q-You were
last elected as M.P but you did not take oath as you were not allowed to take sword
inside. Do you still justify it ?
Mann - As
you are aware that the Constitution of India provides that carrying of a sword
was a fundamental rights of the Sikhs. You have now seen that how they respect
their Constitution when it comes to the right of minorities. Yasar Arafat of
Palestine Liberation Organisation was allowed to take inside a loaded pistol
and address the parliament. A similar question was asked by a prominent Hindu
lawyer. I said."Supposing Khalistan is created and in its Assembly a Hindu
is asked to take off his janeo (religious thread) would you then like to go to
the Assembly ? The lawyer said he would Sword is not merely a sword, it is our
symbol also a symbol of 'sovereignty. See in l97l Bangladash war when Gen.
Niazi surrendered, he first laid down his sword and then other arms. Had I laid
down the sword then, the Sikhs would have termed me as a traitor of the Panth.
Q-What would
be your approach when you are elected for Parliament next time ?
Mann - l
have written to Akal Takhat to know whether I did a wrong thing.
Q-supposing
if they, don't reply to your query?
Mann - Then
it is their weakness. The circumstances will tell what I will do next time, By
now the attitude of the Hindu is known to everybody. I will see what is to be
done. Though the right thing should have been that I am elected again and again
and refused entry in the parliament every time. I wish our electorate is that enlightened.
lt is important so that the world knows how we are being discriminated. See the
American presidents have been shot dead, in spite of this the Govt. has not
banned arms since it is the fundamental right of the Americans.
Q-About the Tercentenary
celebration. What do you feel how it should be ?
Mann - I do
not believe in constructing monuments and taking out processions. Guru sahib
has created Khalsa to rule."Raj bina nahin dharam chalen hai." (A
religion can't survive without a State) Guru ji had said. So you can't fix some
goal other than how to gain sovereignty.
Q- What do
you mean by sovereignty? (Mann parried the answer)
Q- How do
you celebrate the occasion then?
Mann - We
have asked the leaders to adopt one programme at least. If you are not prepared
for the heavy dose, something minimum should
be adopted. The 1973 Anandpur Resolution, Sikhs are a separate nation, 1986 resolution
for the sovereignty, the 1994 Amritsar resolution.
Q-What is
Moga conference resolution, Badal Sahib often refers to?
Mann - Akali
Dal was launched to work for the preservation of the separate identity of the Sikhs,
But in the Moga conference Badal sahib is talking about Punjabiat and has sidelined
the Sikh cause.
Q- Coming to
Udham Singh Nagar- Have you Akalis not befooled Punjabis to divert their
attention from the real issues of Punjab?
Mann - We
have agitated for the protection of interest of our Punjabis who would have otherwise
been uprooted. There is the land ceiling in the Uttranchal state to be formed with
the limit of only two and half acres while our brethren have farms of 100 acres
or more, I am still hopeful that the Govt. will not ignore our opposition and
not ruin the Punjabis there.
Q- Who of
the two Jathedars of the Akal Takhat do you accept ?
Mann - We do
not accept Giani Puran Singh as Jathedar though we have a high regards for him.
He has been appointed by Badal and other concerned parties and institutions
were not consulted. He can't be true Jathedar of the entire Panth.
Q- Don't you
consider that SGPC alone is the representative body of the Sikhs.
Mann - Yes,
SGPC is the parliament of the Sikhs but in the appointment of Akal Takhat Jathedar other institutions and parties are also
consulted.
Q- Don't you
feel that Bhai Ranjit Singh was rather over aggressive (Mann parried the
querry).
Q- Do you
justify summons to Baljindef Singh Hamdard editor Daily Ajit ?
Mann - the
Akal Takhat Jathedar can seek the explanation of any Sikh. Summoning does not
mean that one is definitely going to be punished.
Q-So you
don't approve Tohra's removal?
Mann - Yes
they should have waited at least till April 15.
Q- Would you
yourself not go to Nirankaris and Radha Soamis to seek their votes ?
Mann - There
is a Hukamnama (edict) against the Nirankaris.(About Radha Soamis- Mann parried
our reference)
Q- Which of
the two do you consider better -the Congress rule or the Badal's rule.
Mann - I
don't find much difference between Badal or Congress.
Q- Would you
not give credit to Badal that there are lass false encounters ?
Mann - There
were few in the rule of Bhathal as well. Badal's regime has also liquidated Sikhs.
For example Kashmir Singh Pandori was killed by the Badals police. Our youth is
rotting in jails. See the TADA detenue are more than 1000 and nothing has been done
for them Pensions to the aged are not being released. The conductors do not
allow free travel to the elderly ladies. Badal Govt. has given a crushing blow
in increasing the octroi Rates of electricity have been increased. Our
education is utterly ignored, thus the precious careers of children are being
spoiled.
Q- Would you
like to say something about Kashmir problem?
Mann - Kashmiris
are being massacred. It needs to be stopped immediately and the plebiscite
promised by the Indian Govt. should be conducted asking the people's choice.
Q- Should
there also be plebiscite in Pak occupied Kashmir as well ?
Mann - Yes,
there should be if the Kashmiris demand it. I want to tell you this Govt. is very
cruel. Mr. Jagmohan the ex-Governor has written in his book that had Mann not marched
on to Kashmir he would have settled the problem. That shows he had plans for
the massacre of the Kashmiris.
(Then in
between two aides of Mr. Mann intervened that we must also highlight the Bhaiya
(migrant labourers from UP and Bihar) issue and we accordingly asked what was
the problem involved ?)
Mann - Both
the BJP and Congress have very dangerous plans for the Punjab and they are bent
upon destroying it…Z
