Showing posts with label 5. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 5. Show all posts

K.L.SAIGAL

Friday, 28 June 2013


 THE MELANCHOLIC MELODY LIVES ON -K.L.SEHGAL
  His name is synonymous with rhythmic, light classical film songs of 1930s and 40s In fact the moment one mentions 'Saigal', songs like ‘Ek bangla bane nyara' echo in one's heart. A singer with music in his veins and honey on his tongue. Kundan Lal Saigal literally sang his way into this world. Singing was such a passion with him that he drank himself to death just 'to sing and act better'. Using merely a harmonium and a pair of cymbals Saigal could produce the most scintillating melodies.
Saigal's popularity is it self a proof that masses of the time had an ear for quality music. All his songs and films were big hits. His knowledge of music and 'hauntingly melodious' voice even attracted the likes of Rabindranath Tagore to comment that 'his melody is not only correct but he perfectly  meaning'. AMRIK SINGH BARHOK had met Saigal on two occasions and profiles on this celebrated singer of yesteryears whose songs still stir many souls. 
On Jan. 18,1947a legend parted company with the mortal souls only to become immortal in the heart of millions of his fans. Kundan Lal Saigal had finally left for 'Nayeehar' leaving indelible impressions behind. Born on April 4, 1904 at Jammu to Amar Chand and Kesar Kaur, in a middle class family from Jalandhar Saigal was a natural artist. After his schooling Saigal moved to Lahore where he found himself a modest job with a company, at a meagre monthly salary of 50 rupees. He, however, was not satisfied and accepted the job to keep the wolf from the  door.'  Music was in Saigal's veins. Furthermore, he had a profound sense of humour, and was easy to get along with, though some say he tended to be moody. But no one denies that he was a happy go lucky fellow.
 It was in 1931-32 that Saigal was spotted reciting one of his most favourite songs  "Jhulana Jhulayen...." at a small, private gathering. His discoverer was Mr. Wali, who had by then made name for story and dialogue writing. He had also directed two or three films Wali liked Saigal's enchanting voice, and his flawless diction of Urdu words. A few days later, Wali invited Saigal to his studio and asked him if he was interested in films or in singing. Saigal's answer, predictably, was yes Hardly a fortnight had elapsed when Wali again set for Saigal. One of the New Theatres big bosses was in Lahore and was staying with Wali as his guest. Wali, it may be mentioned, married Mumtaz Shanti the heroine of a Punjabi film, "Sohni Kumharan", which broke all previous records in the country. The record was  only nearly matched, two years later, by a Hindi film 'Kismet' made by Bombay Talkies. His films interestingly, also featured Mumtaz Shanti in the lead role. Wali and Saigal sang the same song ('Jhulana Jhulayen') for the benefit of the New Theatre functionary.' The visitor from Calcutta was greatly impressed. The following day, a contract was signed between the singer and the company. It was for a period of five years, in the first instance. The salary, however, was very meagre.
The end of 1932 saw the release of Saigal's first film with New Theatres. It was titled "Mohabbat Ke Aansu" (The Tears of Love) and was directed by P. Ttorihy (?). Two years later, in 1934, 'Chandidas' was released. It was directed by Nitin Bose. "Devdas" directed by P C. Barua came in 1935. The film featured Jamuna {who had been discovered by Barua himself). She was cast in the role of "Paro". the heroine of the movie. This film caused one of the biggest stirs in the history of Indian Cinema. It became a super hit. The impact was so great that both Jamuna and Saigal became synonymous with 'Paro' and 'Devdas', respectively. The film ends on a tragic note. Saigal drinks himself to death following the heroine's refusal or inability to reciprocate his amorous advances. Two of this film's songs, "Balam aye baso mere man mein ..." and "Dukh ke din ab bitat nahin" became all time hits. Both Jamuna and Saigal had been catapulted into the dizzy heights of superstardom. The film director, P.C. Barua Iater married the actress.
Although Saigal had almost permanently settled down in Calcutta ,he never thought of severing his umbilical cord with Punjab. At least once every year he would visit Punjab to meet his relatives in Jalandhar and his fans and admirers in Lahore. Lahore, then, had acquired the reputation of being the touchstone of lndian films because of the enthusiastic reception of the good films.
 Anywhere else in those days, play back singing was not heard of. Understandably, actors who could sing beautifully were preferred. New Theatres had three of the most popular singers  Pahari Sanyal, KC. Dey (father of the celebrated singer. Manna Dey), and Saigal himself. K C DeY was called the "Blind Singer" because of the blindness in both his eyes Singing was considered very important for films. Romances were popular even then but mostly good, clean films were produced.
 Saigal had PlaYed in almost all kinds of films  romantic, social, musical, mythological, religious, and historical. And in almost all films, he played the title role. For instance, in 'Chandidas' he played Chandidas. In 'Devdas' he played Devdas, ln 'Tansen' he plaYed Tansen, and in 'shahjehan' he played Shahjehan. None of his films flopped. As a matter of fact, Saigal's presence in a film was an insurance against possible failure. In 'Tansen' Saigal was paired with one of the leading actresses of the day  Khurshid Begum. She was the film's heroine. Her song "Pahle jo mohabbat se inkar kiya hota……". became an instant hit. Its haunting tune was hummed by lovers of music for years to follow. Saigal himself gave several songs  all hits.
Saigal's 'shahjehan' was both a historlcal as well as musical. The film had some of the finest songs Those which are heard very often on the 'All lndia Radio', include. "Chaah barbad kare gi, humen maisom na tha", "Sham dive mustaggil, 'kitna nazuk hai dil", "Toot gaye sab sapne mere", and "ab ji kar kya karen ge, jab dil hi toot gaya". "shahjehan" was Saigal's last film.
Saigal played a wide range of roles in a variety of films. He tried two or three comedies  President' and 'Karorpati', but it was in the tragic roles that the actor excelled. Indeed, he Was 'tragedy', personified. Saigal must be given credit for introducing 'society' girls to the screen, although Pune's "Prabhat Film Company" had also, about the same time introduced quite a number of talented girls from affluent families.  Nalini Tarkhud and Shanta Apte, to mention just two of them In "President" he was paired with two new heroines  both from rich and sophisticated families. They were Leela Desai and Kamlesh Kumari. In the movie both the girls are sisters and are in love with the hero (Saigal). One of the film's songs "lk bangla baney nyara" is still as fresh and popular as it was half a century ago. 
The 'New Theatres' were known for quality and not quantity. They made just one film a year, on an average. Saigal faith fully stood by the company until he himself called a day. Saigal did not last long on the film scene. But, as long as he was on the screen, he shone like the 'Pole Star' dominating the cine scene. His supremacy was not challenged until he himself chose to withdraw from the field In about fifteen year period of this star in the industry, Saigal appeared in about a dozen and half films. Other films in which Saigal appeared include "street Singer", "Dushman", "Meri Bahen", and "KarwaneHayat" (The Cara van of Life) In this film, Saigal is a member of a nomadic tribe which is perpetually on the move travelling by day; and halting by a suitable site by night. This film had one of Saigal's most enchanting songs, "Hazrate nazara aakhir ban gayee rehnaivan" It was a tragic song, sung in a group, The carefree and happy go lucky members of the party, including two young girls sing and dance in amazing abandon and uninhibitedness.

A special feature of Saigal's singing was that he needed only a harmonium and a pair of cymbals to produce the most scintillating melodies In fact, there were no Laxmi kant PYare lals or Shankar Jai kishans at that time. Nor were elaborate orchestras used.
I had the opportunity and privilege of meeting the superstar twice in the forties. The first time we met was at a public reception held to welcome at the vast ground near 'Gurdwara Dera Sahib' and the Red Fort (Lahore). The sec ond time we met was at a common friend's house (also at Lahore). I asked the actor, why he drank excessively if not horribly, he replied: "To sing and act better." "Drinking does not detract from the quality of my singing or acting," he quipped. "On the contrary," he added, "it helps to get the best out of me." ln support of this contention, he cited the case of his musical, street singer, which turned Kanan Bala, a   very gifted actress and songstress of all times. I would have to compete with Kanan, who is a reputed singer. It posed a challenge for me I, therefore, drank heavily before each of my song was filmed or recorded," the actor confided. This reminds me of the famous lines of Winston Churchill, who once declared: "l have taken more out of drinking than it has taken out of me."
Among Saigal's religious films, the more notable were "Puran Bhagat" and "Surdas". Saigal is also remembered as a trendsetter, in that with his emergence as a singer performer, the popularity of stunt films began to decline, giving way to soft, sentimental and emotional types of films. Although Saigal's singing repertoire was amazingly wide and varied, ghazal was his 'forte' In most of his films, he played a' disappointed, rejected, or jilted lover, or a victim of unacknowledged love. Understandably' the songs or ghazals he sang had a touch of agony and pathos. Was he a victim of unrequitted love in real life too? Many are convinced he was. We all know he drank himself to death. Saigal is no more with us, but his memory always is. His tragic songs have immortalised him, just as he has immortalised the' New Theatres' (the company he worked for, lived for, and died for).

Continue Reading | comments

WHAT IF NO OLYMPIC MEDAL WE PRODUCE BEAUTY QUEENS

Thursday, 27 June 2013

WHAT IF NO OLYMPIC MEDAL

Add caption

WE PRODUCE THE BEAUTY QUEENS

Hindutava or RSS  mindset people feel the world is jealous of India the world power and that is why India is discriminated against globally. See what they think…
Our unique ancient science is yet to be recognized by the world . What the scientists are doing today we did it 5,000 years ago.  We had pushap vimanas what the world has today in the form of jet airplanes. Because we are different people and different from the rest. The West has stolen our ancient books and they are getting ideas from those. Look what u can do without digit zero (0) invented by ancient Indian mathematicians.
It is surely the indifferent and discriminatory attitude of the Olympic Committee that they deliberately ignore the events where we excel: of laziness, dishonesty, corruption, casteism, communal violence, genocide of minorities, and caste wars. Sad no notice of us is being taken of or acknowledged or accepted as an event. To encourage Olympics what have we not done? Did we not give give  P.T Usha, Milkha Singh etc. the honours of winners of Olympic Gold medals while they had missed even the bronze. Discrimination….
Thank God now at last the world has come to realize our leg power. It is not just a days of pursuit though It took us years. We are proud of our Sushmita Sen, Aishvarya , Diana Hayden, Lara Duttas and are destined to produce many such Beauty  Queens. Can any country match our effort on this event: our  competitions namely Miss Street, Miss City, Miss State, Miss lndia and then with heads held high we throw challenge at Miss World and then Miss Universe contests. Our future competitions will be Miss Cosmos and Miss Galaxy and Miss lnfinite and so  on.
We, as you know produce biggest number of films in the world and none would be complete if some 'Prem Kahani' or Love story is not depicted. What ever the action our brave lndians out-rightly reject any show which  does not have some sex appeal in it.
We hate such cultures which promote work culture. Stupid isn’t it ‘Work is Worship'?  If we have got a little amount of money we need not work at all. We get , those 'very active' servants from Bihar, Orissa etc. who would work just for , Rs. 500 or 1000 a month : we have a culture in which one man works and feeds' ten mouths'. It is a matter of pride that about 90% of our girls are busy in , nail growing mission. Their families take pride in it and would help them grow then to ‘some  honourable  length’. What more discriminatory treatment of the Olympics could be that they have not added or acknowledged it as an Olympic event.
We are proud of our Bathinda district of the Punjab where the liquor consumption is more than the consumption of many countries put together. Even the consumption is more than that of the whole of UP state. Should there be any fall in the liquor consumption, it adversely affects on the Govts and Govt might fall. ls not our economy unique ?
On the front of illiteracy, we are number one. Why should we produce more educated people as they start demanding one thing after other. Who will give them jobs? Ours is a  closed door economy. Why should we open our doors to the world? Interaction with the world and our whole unique character is lost. Interaction with the world and we are in danger ‘desh ki akhandta ko khatra ho jata’.We don't want any inroads into our unique culture. Our caste culture is well founded and don't you know even our 'Father of Nation’ (Mahatma Gandhi) used to take pride in it and would justify casteism. Doesn’t our intellectuals defend it every now and then? We are proud of our heritage.  Mera Bharat mahan.
Continue Reading | comments

CENTRAL OFFICES VIOLATING LANGUAGE POLICY

Wednesday, 26 June 2013

CENTRAL OFFICES IN PUNJAB ARE VIOLATING LANGUAGE POLICY OF GOVT


To keep the Punjabis divided the Govt of India took a leaf from British colonial administration. Since Arya Samaj had opposed Punjabi even in pre-Independence days the Govt considered to keep them divided on language issue. Though Punjabi speaking Punjab was carved out by diving the state in 1966 the Punjabi language still remains deprived of its due place in its home state. Communalism promoted by divisive policies of the Govt  gave rise to a secret  anti-Punjabi campaign depriving this language of the masses of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs became one of the most deprived, ignored and disowned languages of the world.
The saddest part of the story is that whatever provisions are available  for the  regional languages of the respective states or the Constitutional provisions or governmental orders, even these are also not being implemented in the state of the Punjab.
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT PUBLICITY (LANGUAGE) POLICY
The ministry of Home affairs has a well defined language policy as to give publicity through a particular language and for maintaining public relations. According to these provisions while carrying out the publicity, the government agencies “Will give preference to the regional language  followed by the State language i e. Hindi and then English.”
Now mark whether Punjabi is being given any place in Central Govt offices in Punjab? What to talk of giving the first place the language is more often than not completely ignored. Thus in reality however exactly the opposite to the Govt policy is happening. For example the sign boards at various places and outside government offices giving information are almost always in English or in Hindi. In most cases none exists in  the Punjabi language at all.
The only place of the Govt of India where Punjabi has been given place is the railway stations where surely the station boards are  definitely in Punjabi but other than that there is no place for this language. However if you enter the offices at the railway  stations  then again Punjabi missing: no where on the name plates of the officers or sections. The language is also conspicuous by its absence at various counters giving directions about the train or ticket bookings.
 A similar step-motherly treatment is given to the language of the Punjabi masses the announcement as to arrival or departure of the trains are seldom given in Punjabi. At some stations recorded announcement do give but the instant announcements are as a rule in Hindi. This is highly surprising since almost all other states use their regional language to impart such information.
Similarly the sign boards of the Army and the Air Force establishments in the Punjab do not give any place to Punjabi neither do  BSF, CRPF and  ITBP do for that matter.
The same is the case with  the Revenue offices like the lncome Tax and the Central Excise and Customs. No sign board in the Punjabi language exists there nor any stationary, forms etc  meant for, public usage are printed in Punjabi.
 Unfortunately the Labour Ministry  in the state too ignores the language and their respective departments do not have forms in Punjabi language although most of the applicants who come to them are conversant only with Punjabi and have no knowledge of either English or Hindi. This makes communication very difficult and leads to corruption and harassment thus the middlemen are born who liaison with office and the individual  as in the case ESI and Provident fund etc.  the Central  Labour Commissioner's Office.
The telephone offices now of course run recorded computer tapes sometimes while attending customer calls. Thus it shows where monetary aspects are concerned the trading Govt office can give place to Punjabi language. But the offices take no notice of the Govt instructions on language policy.
The telephones never thought of bringing out directories  in Punjabi, the way they exist in other states. The offices of the telecommunication department in the state too have no sign boards in Punjabi or, for that matter, neither has the post and telegraph department. The same is true of the Ministry of External Affairs offices in the Punjab which also neglects the language. An example is the passport application form which is either in English or in Hindi.
 DOORDARSHAN AND FILMS
Jalandhar Doordarshan’s Punjabi programmes are a worst. Half hearted attempts  of producing   programmes in Punjabi language create a havoc rendering either the programme a mess. Most of their anchors and compares come from  Hindi school background who speak Punjabi with Hindi accent. Mostly it re-casts programmes produced by other centres of Doordarshan thus promoting Hindi language among our village folks. As far as language aspect is concerned the news casting is satisfactory plus the Punjabi literary programmes.
A similar complaint, can  be registered against the Punjabi film industry also. The pathetic condition of the Punjabi films makes  one shameful.  Copy cat stories of themes of Hindi films with poor and overstressed dialogues. One wonders while the Punjabi heroes can dominate the Bollywood  how come their home movies are miserable? Surely incapable producers and directors. Also the  Sikhs feel , that their image is more often than not tarnished in these movies since the roles have Sikh names  but the actors are usually clean-shaven. Language wise  also the performance is miserable.
HOPELESS DAVP
  The Directorate of Advertising and Visual Publicity under the Ministry of information and Broadcasting is doing no good either. One feels it has translators from Delhi who know very little of Punjabi and often transliterate rather than translating into Punjabi.
 Only one or two advertisements are released to Punjabi news papers which is more in the nature of helping or winning  the newspapers than any genuine effort of sincere publicity. Most of the advertisements of the respective departments and ministries are released to the papers without translation and are therefore carried by the news papers in verbatim i.e. in English or in Hindi.
For example all  advertisements from the UPSC are carried by the Punjabi news papers in Hindi or in English. This is highly surprising since DAVP does have an army of translators and writers.
 In any case the DAVP ads in Doordarshan are often laughed at. Advertisements related to Family planning are a real mess since the actors  seem to be very uncomfortable in speaking Punjabi language. May be DAVP does not know dubbing. Almost always their  Hindi accent especially some Punjabi sounds seem foreign  to them like ghar (house) bhara (brother) etc.
PUNJABI PAPERS
 It is unfortunate that the language we advocate is not even written properly by those who, wish to keep its banner high i.e, the regional newspapers.  Language of the Punjabi news papers is often loaded with Sanskritised Hindi words as in vogue with Hindi papers. Daily Ajit does seem to be a bit cautious in this regard but going through Punjabi editions of the Tribune and Puniab Kesri it is often felt as if one  is reading Hindi through Gurmukhi script. . The  Centrat Goverurment' s advertisement policy to goes in the interest of Hindi or English papers. For: example a hoard of advertisements were released to Punjab Kesri while Ajit was deprived of them. The field reporters are often impressed by the TV news. They often tend to use the Hindi terms in their dispatches. It is the sub-editors job to check the language. We often see un-digestible Hindi words appearing in Punjabi newspapers. In matters of circulation it is the funds that carry weight and obviously the Punjabi news papers are fighting a losing battle against the Hindi papers.
SCHOOLS
 The position of the Punjabi language is miserable in the schools even in the state itself. Although the most spoken language, rather the language of every household in the state, it has failed to enjoy any status as the other regional languages do in their respective regions. In every other state study of the regional language is compulsory while in the Punjab this is not so. There the medium of instruction is also the regional language. The same rules are applicable to the Punjab as well but here giving in to the pressure of the DAV ideology, Hindi has emerged as the favourite medium of instruction besides English which is more prevalent among the states. Since past four five decades the governmnent is relaxing this  rule on a year to year basis and is evading implementation of the regional language. Besides Punjab Govt is very liberal in allowing permissions to schools to get them affiliated to central boards like the CBSE and ICSE. The result being Punjab has emerged the first state where largest percentage of schools have been affiliated to central boards. Virtually Punjab has become a bilinqual state and no  politician has enough courage to come to the rescue of Puniabi language. The result is that Hindi has become the spoken language of the school going children. In fact the schools  consider it below dignity to converse in their mother tongue Punjabi.
In DAV schools etc. the conversation is as a rule in Hindi. ln junior classes of the colleges the study of Punjabi as a subject is also being avoided. The students have option to study Punjabi culture as a subject against the study of Punjabi as a subject. Thus many go on to study the Punjabi culture in English rather than Study the language itself. In the end it can be remarked that Punjabis go to some other region, learn the language of that area but hesitate to speak their own language In contrast the migrant labourers from UP and the Hindi belt in Punjab maintain their Hindi instead of learning the local Punjabi. With time their numbers are increasing. This too is playing a role in making Punjabi a secondary language in its homeland as the Punjabi villager is seen conversing in Hindi with these migrants, though with difficulty, while the migrant workers make no effort to learn and speak Puniabi. As a result it can be envisaged that the third generation from today will be at home in Hindi even in the Punjabi heartland further pushing their own mother tongue to periphery.
Continue Reading | comments

FEDERAL INDIA

Saturday, 15 June 2013

COALITIONS IN THE CENTRE - INDIA HEADING TOWARDS FEDERALISM


The early man was settled in tribal groups where the fittest man was its head and ruler. There were inter-tribal conflicts, wars and invasions with the motive of plundering the property of the weak groups. This type of tribal governments were even there when Alexander invaded India some 2300 years ago. These tribal governments often collaborated with the neighbouring tribes for their mutual security and this collaboration is called federation which is considered by the political scientists as an ideal form of governance. 

1947 ਵੇਲੇ ਕੋਈ ਅਜਾਦੀ ਵਜਾਦੀ ਨਹੀ ਸੀ ਆਈ। ਸਿਰਫ ਹਕੂਮਤ ਬਦਲੀ (ਟਰਾਂਸਫਰ) ਸੀ। ਏਥੇ ਅੱਜ ਸਹੀ ਲੋਕਤੰਤਰ ਨਹੀ, ਠਗਣਾ ਲੋਕਤੰਤਰ ਹੈ। ਅਸਲੀ ਲੋਕਤੰਤਰ ਉਹ ਹੁੰਦਾ ਹੈ ਜਿਥੇ ਹਕੂਮਤ ਲੋਕਾਂ ਦੀ ਹੋਵੇ। ਪਰ ਭਾਰਤ ਵਿਚ ਤਾਂ ਹਕੂਮਤ ਦਿੱਲੀ ‘ਚ ਚੰਦ ਬੰਦਿਆਂ ਦੀ ਏ। ਭਾਰਤ ਵਿਚ ਪੰਚਾਇਤਾਂ, ਮੁਨਿਸਪਾਲਟੀਆਂ ਕੋਲ ਅਸਲੀ ਤਾਕਤ ਨਹੀ ਹੈ। ਹੋਰ ਤੇ ਹੋਰ ਸੂਬੇ ਵੀ ਤਾਕਤ ਪੱਖੋ ਖੋਖਲੇ ਨੇ। ਹਾਂ ਸੂਬਿਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਪੁਲਿਸ ਜਰੂਰ ਦੇ ਰੱਖੀ ਹੈ ਤਾਂ ਕਿ ਭਰਮ ਭਾਅ ਬਣਿਆਂ ਰਹੇ। ਅਸਲੀ (ਅੰਗਰੇਜ ਵਾਲੀ) ਤਾਕਤ ਕੇਂਦਰ ਕੋਲ ਹੈ। ਹਾਸੇ ਵਾਲੀ ਗਲ ਤੁਹਾਨੂੰ ਦਸੀਏ ਕਿ ਅਮਰੀਕਾ ਦੀ ਕਿਸੇ ਮੁਨਿਸਪਾਲਿਟੀ ਕੋਲ ਜਿੰਨੀ ਤਾਕਤ ਹੈ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਸਰਕਾਰ ਕੋਲ ਓਨੀ ਵੀ ਨਹੀ। ਅਕਾਲੀ ਐਵੇ ਸੁੱਕੀਆਂ ਕੱਛਾਂ ਮਾਰਦੇ ਰਹਿੰਦੇ ਨੇ।ਪ੍ਰੋਫੈਸਰ ਰਸ਼ੀਦਉਦੀਨ ਖਾਂ ਨੇ ਕਿਤਾਬ ਲਿਖੀ ਸੀ (ਫੈਡਰਲ ਇੰਡੀਆ)  ਕਿ ਜੇ ਭਾਰਤ ਨੇ ਸੱਚ ਮੁੱਚ ਲੋਕਾਂ ਦੇ ਹੱਥ ਤਾਕਤ ਦੇਣੀ ਹੈ ਤਾਂ ਇਥੇ ਸੰਘੀ ਰਾਜ ਹੋਵੇ ਭਾਵ ਇਕਾਈਆਂ ਤਾਕਤਵਰ ਹੋਣ ਸੂਬੇ ਤਾਕਤਵਰ ਹੋਣ। ਕੇਂਦਰ ਕੋਲ ਸਿਰਫ ਫੌਜ, ਵਿਦੇਸ਼ ਮਾਮਲੇ, ਕਰੰਸੀ ਤੇ ਸੰਚਾਰ ਦੇ ਮਹਿਕਮੇ ਹੀ ਹੋਣ। ਅਸਾਂ ਉਸ ਦੀ ਕਿਤਾਬ ਦੇ ਅਧਾਰ ਤੇ ਇਹ ਅੰਗਰੇਜੀ ਵਿਚ ਲੇਖ 1998 ਵਿਚ ਲਿਖਿਆ ਸੀ। 

It was the earnest desire of the founding fathers of the Indian Constitution that the country would become a real republic i.e the governance by people themselves. Accordingly the founders gave certain guidelines to the future rulers of the independent India in the form of Directive Principles of State policy. They wished that the real power be transferred to the people themselves through the Panchayat or other local bodies. It is 50 years since India became independent now and the rulers have not moved an inch in this direction. The result is, more and more people are getting disgusted with the rule. Its reflection can be seen in the form of unrest in North-Eastern states, in Gorkhaland, the Caste wars, Uttrakhand, Jharkhand, Khalistan, Jammu and Kashmir, Babri retaliations, Tamils, Shiv Senas, Naxalism etc. The fact is today there is more violence against Delhi than it was before 1947 against the British. Its only reason is that the power has not been transferred to the local level. Governance is becoming more and more centralised and where ever and whenever people raised their voice for more powers these were termed by the rulers as secessionist overtones.
Those whose fathers and grand fathers fought the battle of independence are worried of its sustenance and preservation. Since the Congress which has virtually ruled the State for about half a century never paid any serious attention to the cries from the periphery. It always tried to harp on the subjects which were constitutionally under the jurisdiction of the States. As a result of which people have started preferring regional parties. Political analysts now agree that in future there would never be the single party rule in the centre, of course except in cases where the party or parties project popular personalities like film stars or some  other emotionally appealing personality. ln past two three occasions we have seen how government formation has been a difficult task but good sense prevailed and we found the coalition governments at the Centre. Now again if the Sonia/ Priyanka factor did not work, we will again have the same situation. If something is not done well in time we may witness some hung partiament resulting into a serious deadlock and elections again. But is it certain that even after elections people will return single parly?
The present government is perhaps a record where 13 regional parties joined hands together to form the government. The return of regional parties is a clear indication what the people want. If this country is to survive it will have to allow greater say to the states, and eventually pass on the power to the local bodies. It is an accepted fact that India is a canglomerate of various nations put together, so much so even the Chairman of the constituent Assembly Dr. Rajinder Prasad also admitted it. It is however different that the Assembly in spite of this fact, gave a highly centripetal constitution to India. Scholars agree that it was because of the Pakistan factor that they ignored the federal model of the government. They felt if the Muslim factor can keep many nationalities together under the Pakistani why not a unitary India where again people were bound with a religious factor. The pakistan experiment however could not last long and in 1971 one nation pulled out from it. We surely want that it should not happen to India and if it is to be kept intact, it will have to pass on the power to the people themselves. Religion always is not a sole factor to keep the countries united. Had it been that USSR would not have split or there would not have been many countries in the Middle East where again the religion is common lslam and Europe where the religion is predominantly Christianity.
Ideally it is the nations that voluntarily come together to form federations for reasons of security and trade. For example Switzerland Confederation was formed some 700 years ago when its units were threatened and it has survived for so long now. There are interesting examples when States would voluntarily come under the umbrella of a larger Nation for security reasons and  there are several examples in the Indian history itself. But only such federations have survived the test of time where the federations allowed greater autonomy to  its constituents.
 In India whosoever raised this voice was dubbed as the secessionist and rejected. The Akali agitation of the early Eighties is a glaring example. The Centre instead of loosening its hold on certain subjects rather tightened it further with the result the principle of governance by the people was further betrayed.
Today the States have less subjects in their list as compared with a local body in the US. The whole system is harshly disposed towards the states. Whatever amount of majority a party might have in the State Assembly the Centre has vast powers to dismiss the Provincial Government if it does not like it. It is not only in principle but the Centre has done it on several occasions. It dismissed the Telgu Desam Government of NTR, CPI (M) Government of Namboodripad. In fact there is a long list of such dismissals where the Centre engineered defections for the formation of governments of its own liking. Even if a State Assembly is allowed to complete its term it has very little to do in view of its limited jurisdiction and funds.
Today the Centre has a long list of 144 subjects to legislate upon (Union-97 and Concurrent-47) while the States have only a list of 66 items only, plus the Centre has residuary powers with it. Also there is a Veto in the hand of President in the case of an assembly bill. Except money bills the President can return the bill otherwise passed by the State Assembly. Major part of the taxation is with the Centre and there "no", defined law as to sharing of the taxes ' and the allocations are purely at the whim and fancy of the Centre. Also India has a unified Civil Services and all the officers like those IAS and IPS are recruited by the Centre and it imposes service restrictions as to the All India  Services Iike the Governor in the state capital its agents in the shape of IAS and IPS officers are watching the whole performance of the state government and obviously reporting to the Centre. Plus the centre has authority to impose the Emergency like it did in 1975 and suspend the Fundamental Rights. It has also the authority to impose Emergency in a particular State instead of whole of India. The Planning Commission again is not a statutory body and is under the direct control of the Cabinet. 'All this shows that India is a highly centralised democracy or the unitary system while a Republic has to be essentially a federal structure.
 Even otherwise also India has never been politically one as it is today. On, no occasion in history it was so much centralised as it is today, except for short period like the British rule of 1857 to 1947, or during the rules of Emperor Ashoka (D. 2328C) Sultan Allauddin  Khalji (D. 1316 AD) and Aurangzeb (D. 1707 AD) lt is also noteworthy that the South was never the part of India during the above Islamic rules. Even during the British Raj the local element was comparatively stronger. So much so there were 356 Princely States at the time of independence. The Ancient India was also regionally organised into the 'Janpaddas'. Vedas and Puranas have references to the existence of such Janpadas or the tribal territories. Vayu Purana gives a detailed account of 165 'Janapadas of Bharatvarsha'. Those 165 Janpadas were constituted under seven major regions or the greater provinces like the 1. Udichya -Eastern, 2.North Western region, 3.Madhya Desha-Central region, 4.Apparanta-Western region, 5.Prachya -Eastern, 6.Dakshinapatha Southern, 7.Vindhyan and the 8.Mountain region. In that ancient India even Afghanistan was part of the Greater India what to talk of Bangla Desh and Pakistan. The janapadas were all Republics in themselves yet there was interaction between them. It was perhaps a perfect model of the federal system.
Just for the amusement of our readers some of the janapads of North and western regions were : Kekays, Shudra, Sindhu, Vahlika, Harpurika, Sakadriha. Madarika, Gandhara, Yavana etc. Interestingly those divisions were based on some logic or some common sense.
Even the Indian administration has acknowledged it that the smaller States are better manageable and its managers often cite the case of Haryana. Ironically the Indian Union which is highly centralised is even larger than more than 170 countries of the world with its 15th position-on the Globe. Except China and perhaps Russia rest of the States which are larger than India have the federal 'type of set-up. India which has 25 States and 6 Union Territories out of which 12 of its States or provinces are even larger than 100 Sovereign countries of the world. Uttar Pardesh with a population of 112 million is even bigger than Bangladesh (103.2 million) and Pakistan (100 million) which themselves are the seventh and eighth largest states of the worid. Similarly the position of Bihar (70 million), Maharashtra (63 million), Andhra Pradesh (54 million), Tamilnadu (49 million), have population individually egual to some. of the larger countries of. the world, like ltaly-57 million, U.K-57, France-55, Phillipines-57, Thailand-53,, Egypt-50, lran-45. Turkey-S1 Canada 26,. Thus India should have atleast 200 provinces if 'the country is to be administred properly and if it is to be formed a true Republic for example those 425 districts of India which are presently the administrative and control units of thd Centre and the Sta{es shoulci be.turnddintd some sorl of locit Sdtf governments with much of the planning decentralised.
janapadas in ancient india from Rashiduddin's Federal India: A design for change




An eminent professor Rasheeduddin Khan who is Internationally reputed and was twice nominated to Rajya Sabha and represented India in the UN General Assembly (1969) and a member of ICSSR, after a thorough study of the, Indian social pattern noted that, "India is thus a continental polity constituted into a single territorial sovereignty. These diversities in India based on religion and caste, language and dialects, cultural patterns, regional pulls etc. are as big in their physical distribution and dimensions as also in their distinctiveness as are normally the hallmark of separate nations. "Prof. Rasheeduddin who attributes the cause of too much centralised India to the urgent urge for national unity underlined by the trauma of partition of the country and says that it was because of this reason that there is too much of bias in favour of greater centralisation of power and thus larger jurisdiction to the Centre. The Professor feels that historically it was the Transfer of Power and not essentially a complete independence to form a Republic. Writes he," Historically the Government of India is the successor of the highly centralised and authoritarian Viceregal Govt. Whose grandeur of power was a match to "the much cited Czarist autocracy of imperial Russia." On the day of Independence the highly powerful Centre was transferred to the Congress. He says,"We should remember that the constitution of India is not a basic agreement between federating units that were previously independent in status but on the contrary a fundamentally made and enforced by a central authority, in the name of people which alone had created the units. To i remedy the rot and to save tfris great country from chaos Prof. Khan has enlisted some of the radical suggestions mooted by some political parties and individuals for immediate consideration:
1.    Constitution be amended so that the residuary powers are with the States instead of the Centre (article 248)
2.    Article 249 be deleted which gives the power to parliament to legislate on the subjects which are on the states list.
3.    Provision of 75% of total revenue to the states. (article-280)
4.     Delete article 302 which empowers parliament to impose restrictions on trade and commerce with a state or, between the states.
5.    Delete articles 356 and 357 the  emergency provisions giving right to the Centre to dissolve a Assembly and impose Presidential rule.
6.    Delete article 360 which empowers the President to interfere in a state administration  on grounds of threat of financial emergency.
7.    Delete article 200 and 201 which empowers the Governor to withhold the assent to bill.
8.    Amend article 3 to ensure that the name and area of state cannot be, changed without the consent of the State Assembly.
9.     Article 370 be not touched and, the demand of BJP and its allies be ignored.
10.    Article 368 be amended so that no amendment to the Constitution is possible without 2/3 majority.
The above suggestions are of course in addition to the recommendations of the Sarkaria Commission. Prof khan has also enlisted some 6 more, proposals as under:
1.     The centre should retain only such portfolio as Defence, Foreign Affairs, Foreign Trade, Currency, Communications, etc.
2.    The States should be adequately represented on the National Development Council,(NDC)
3.    The NDC and Planning Commission should have statutory powers.
4.    All India services like the IAS, lFS, IPS etc. be abolished and only the Union services and the State services should exist.' Further Centre should not have any, jurisdiction over the personal of state governments.
5.    Seventh schedule and the three lists should be suitably amended to give greater autonomy to states.
6.    To ensure the basic federal principle of equality, federating states should have equal representation to Rajya Sabha (and Lok Sabha also) however there could be exception to States and territories with very small population.
7.    Before this, however the following issues and suggestions should also be considered;
 (i) Territorial reorganisation of states on the criterian of providing to states maximum homogeneity within and maximum identity without   on the five principles of
(a) Socio-cultural affinity in terms of language, dialects, beliefs, religious communities and historical memories,
(b) Ethnic similarity, caste, tribe etc,
(c) Administrative manageability in terms of economy and population,
 (d) Distinct patterns of economy,
(e) Size of the State commensurate. with the need for closer contact between the voters and their representatives. In brief the main concern should be to create States which are socioculturally, homogeneous and administratively and politically manageable. ..
 (ii),Activation bf the Punchayati Raj and Nagarpalika system with necessary devolution of authority to build active grass-roots democracy.


Continue Reading | comments

GREY HAIR

GREY HAIR - SNOW ON THE ROOF DOESN'T MEAN THERE IS NOT FIRE IN THE FURNACE
by Lowel Ponte


Continue Reading | comments

JATTS

JATTS - A REBEL RACE RISES FROM SHUDRA TO SUPREMACY

Jatts or Jats a caste (or a race) of North India and Pakistan was originally bracketed into the Shudra category of Brahmin. However with their uprightness they raised their status in social hierarchy. In Sikhism their status is even above the Brahmins. In this article we read their interesting traits.




Continue Reading | comments

WAGAH FENCE TO VANISH

Friday, 14 June 2013

"WAGAH FENCE BOUND TO VANISH IN 10 YEARS" so said a Swedish Scholar 15 years ago


 


State's hold on trade, commerce and economy stands  rejected through the demise of USSR. The lndian experiment  of protected entrepreneurship has collapsed as is evident from  the disinvestment policy of the government. Open international  trade has got such a boost that many European countries have  practically openend their borders. Multinational companies are  moving in everywhere and their slogan is "Peace is good for  business". Obviously they do not invest in such regions where  peace is threatened and indirectly work as a pressure group  on any nation for maintenance of peace.  An interesting factor has however emerged in the west,  i.e. the consumption has reached a saturation point and whatever amount of advertising, it has failed to generate demand.  The western companies are obviously looking for markets where  they can sell theii products. They see lndian sub-continent has  a big potential for their products.  Economic zones are fast developing like ECM and  ASEAN etc. and they have banned further entries. lf the  nations of the sub-continent are to survive economically they  will have to come out on a collective platform. Mian Nawaz  Sharief recently speaking at Dhaka had hinted at such a necessity while Mr. Gujral also felt the need of such a dialogue  with Pakistan. 
Accordingly a Swedish intellectual of Pakistan origin has  a firm belief that a time in a few years will come when this type  of free trade between lndia and Pakistan will bring the otherwise two hostile brothers together. The scholar MR. ASIF SYED  SHAHKAR tells Dr. UMA ARORA that the Sikhs ardas of "khule  darshan ate sewa sambal da dan" is being conceded by the  Allah Waheguru very shortly, perhaps within 10 years.

(Note: Sorry the machine typing (OCR) was giving too many errors we have thus posted the images of pages)





/'.: you f.c r Kalanaur?" in.r,,f es an al,l l1]an to each person  ' i.riitrl ifcrn 1t)rj k)r!y which has just  ii|, ! cii fr()itt Lanor i I tllltgtng pilgrimsto  i.i lil...lla SalIb. [].rrely ffanaging to  !:!ri.i oo his leqs h.Jldrng on to the arm  :1 r'r's;iirL,ady rrritated grandson the ocl j.r'., i :-r., pleads to wait for another  k-,IV. 1.,.rri ri alLrllan] !,lho has just ascendrid lrJr!r lho- lr)try, answer$ in the  "f:rntativr l,-re old rllan's Joy knows no  lrir[nr]s. i1e lhilnks Allah hugs Gurnam  r,,llr is much force as he can muster  .. J willt tt,.rr s Sl, eatrrtl!j dCWn htS Wrin".i,. ::.iace Utqt.rtres aboUt the land he had  .ll li;ilf;r cenluty ago.  (,rr thrs srde ofthe border too we  ,riv.,.ur old people becoming nostal
gic about the land they were born on but  had to leave under desperate circumstances. ln theirhearts cuddles an urge  to visit their birth ptace al ieasl once rn  lheir lifetime. The communal bloody carnage thatdivided the sub -continent has  become history. -foday fervent hopes  and desires are cherished to be able to  communicate with the people across lhe  border. With the prime Ministers of both  lndia and Pakistan hopeful of congenial  relations a time can be envisaged when  borders willfinally mean to be whal they  really should, a mere political boundary.  ln fact Prime Minrster Gujral is optimistic that Pakistan would shed its reluctance to improve trade and business relations which would eventually pave the 
way for better neighbouring relations to  reduce tensions.  Can it really happerr? Can we  visit the l;rnd of our forefathers without  any fear? is it possible thal we will be  able to welcorr-ie the people from across  the border in our homes just as our grand  parents did uuitirout a qualm or animosity? Such questrons have become inevitahle since a possrbility has arisen  r.vherein economic conrpulsions will inI 'duce the politicians of the subcorrtinent  to resolve the confhct and open borders  for easier movement arrd better trade relations.  ' UJe have one history, similar culturalroots anci perhaps same forefathers  but at a turn rn history we divrdcJ oirrselves in two separate natiolrs closrng  out allwindows and possibrlitres for cornmunication. Now hrstory is agarn taking  a turn and at the fag end of thc. current  t century there is a dritrncl possrbrlity tlrat  a new dawn willemerge, a new'sauera'  will perhaps lead us to a pornt wherr forgetting the mutual hatred we will develop  friends across the border.  Easing of tension betweerr the  two arch rivals on the subcontinent lras  special significance for Punjab and  Punjabis, they being in the middle of it.  They were the worst sufferers at the time  of division and now when the borders  will be opened Punjab, especially  Amritsar, would once again become the  gateway of lndia for trade with central  Asian countries. ln Mr. Gujral's words  "The coming century belongs to Punjab".  This might not be too difficult since both  Nawaz Shariff and Rafiq Tarar hailfrom  Punjab and would try their utmost best  to dismantle structures heraldirrg the  grourth of the regron.  Now the Commonwealth of lndepenrlent States (ClS) ar"e looking to lndia as the most developed i'ration in Asia  . to open tl'ie trade channels. \ Jith the  emergence of South Asia Preferential  Trade Agreenrent (SAPTA) it can be expected that trade and business relations  would eventually lead to better exchange and interaction at the mass level  too.  A similar prophecy is made by a  man who does not believe in boundaries separating the sub-continent ln different nations. "These barbed wires shall  cease to exist by the end of next ten  years" he says. Hailing from nbighbouring Pakistan and now a Swedish citizen, 
a scholar turned businessman and a  marketing personnel, Asif Syed was recently in Amritsar to fulfill his ardent desire to hold a doctoral thesis from Guru  Nanak Dev University. He speaks and  writes in five languagps viz. Swedish,  English, Hindi, Urdu and Punjabi and  has travelled round the globe either attaining degrees or learning newer skills  but all the time sharpening his mental  faculties and internalising global relations which finally have become a passion with him.  The realities of international economics totally changed his perspective  of looking at everything. lt became almost Iike re-interpretation of an intellectual in him'a new engine to my [ntellectual being i.e. marketing was provided'  says Asif Syed who likes to be known  as a free-lance salesman and journal 
ist. ln these times when everyone is  talk ing about globalization this man of  self learning has his own philosophy  and way of looking at issues which have  concerned the intelligentsia for a while  now. Some of his ideas do seem surprising, even intriguing especially when  he convincingly talks about demolishing of the mental borders of the subcontinent. He feels, these, in the first  place, exist because of the "unseen iib  stract enemy" and the moment people  will be able to see each other in pe:snrr  the hatred sowed by the politicians L,r.-rii  change into compassion for each oti:,,:r'  Then even a manipulative politiciit:; !t{,  shall have to resign and adopi .:i inritual benefit scheme of peacefui e:<ist  ence. 
Q. Throughout the world people are  tightening therr  belts to gear up for  the next century.  Where do you see  lndia and Pakistan  in this whole scenario?  Today. at the fag errd  of the twentieth century whrch has seerr  so much bloodshed.  two shattering wars  and worst forms of  violence because of  political borders. it  can be predicted that  peace is inevitable in  ille lrearfuture of both  these corrntrres.  '"Yorid politics has surr enri*red to the rnarket and stnce market  i,.as power actions of  v-arrous countries are  decrded by the market  forces. Secondly,  economic and military  power is shrfting from  West to Asia. ln the  rrear future greater  Cheen (China, Hong  Kong, Bangkok) will  emerge as a formidable super power And  to balance this super  power there will be  subcontinent power. 
  Q.What would be 
He left Paxistan in 11i77 r.rl'ierr it irecarne drffi
cult to prodlrce horrest. creatlve prograrrlrltes  on Lahore I V freely and tnen pernranently scr  tied in Srr,reoen.and for" ilris he has come {li)  with a ne'rt iheory of proetic syslem and lv::rrls  to study tite [-ri:cla rri i:'tirjab. F{e feels f.:oetrv  being cultirral systrnr snould be relnterprelecl  Bcrn on npril 15. 1948, Asrf wrlnt ttu  frrrson in 1971 y7i:sr1 he sLroke anci wrr;ie i:cenis agitr"lst killrrrqs.:n [Salrgladesh. lfri:,r ire  i:ecan-le a producer ori Lahore -IV. 'Urrra L;i'r.;,;,  Flalra Par' arrd'[t4pri r;rrrrlli nr;tcldni L.alrwa r,<-,r,I  tnein chan-cirtur drrri r-idh:i' are s;onre popuiur"  sollgs prodttcerl l-ry i11i1r  Hc leurnt :i!'/cdtsh film science alrd dis,  COVere.l tllil ;) irn\rl i;tiCtr:rlV ivas enterging r)n  the interrr;:ttriirr;rl sriorte ilre lrtformation sc,-:r.ety ln crt.-(.f ii) frr.ld ilti)re ,rtid rrti-rre abcrut lf ris  rlew S(iclel:,, tlt: be1lan t0 l(rarn t;0nillUler Sys.  tenrs. Tlteri hi: tr-rtnect rlrlo a bl;siiri:sr; rir.rrr..  started his own tlotiier: t.lrilirr stotes itt':;,il:..t.::,1  tha,t rtrarket;ng is ,rs lrnporlant as, lt-r, ';, ,il,ri  or arr iult:a ire Si;iri his bttt.rrtesi (il:u !,'r',,',,'l  into intcrnatrorrai nrarketing i' ; l 
this sub-continent power ? 
Bangladesh shall form a unlt ,:rr i{-l ivoi iid  be known as subcontinent'pov',,r:r 'W+stern econonrists alrd exper-ts on rnter  national relations have caii:ll;rleC ttriil  by the year 2O2O Chin;i i^;rii $s '.r.,io lLr  three times richer than tlir USA ir,iith 
a scholar turned businessman and a  marketing personnel, Asif Syed was recently in Amritsar to fulfill his ardent desire to hold a doctoral thesis from Guru  Nanak Dev University. He speaks and  writes in five languagps viz. Swedish,  English, Hindi, Urdu and Punjabi and  has travelled round the globe either attaining degrees or learning newer skills  but all the time sharpening his mental  faculties and internalising global relations which finally have become a passion with him.  The realities of international economics totally changed his perspective  of looking at everything. lt became almost Iike re-interpretation of an intellectual in him'a new engine to my [ntellectual being i.e. marketing was provided'  says Asif Syed who likes to be known  as a free-lance salesman and journal 
ist. ln these times when everyone is  talk ing about globalization this man of  self learning has his own philosophy  and way of looking at issues which have  concerned the intelligentsia for a while  now. Some of his ideas do seem surprising, even intriguing especially when  he convincingly talks about demolishing of the mental borders of the subcontinent. He feels, these, in the first  place, exist because of the "unseen iib  stract enemy" and the moment people  will be able to see each other in pe:snrr  the hatred sowed by the politicians L,r.-rii  change into compassion for each oti:,,:r'  Then even a manipulative politiciit:; !t{,  shall have to resign and adopi .:i inritual benefit scheme of peacefui e:<ist  ence. 
Q. Throughout the world people are 
tightening therr  belts to gear up for  the next century.  Where do you see  lndia and Pakistan  in this whole scenarlo?  Today. at the fag errd  of the twentieth century whrch has seerr  so much bloodshed.  two shattering wars  and worst forms of  violence because of  political borders. it  can be predicted that  peace rs irrevitable in  tirq: rrearfuture of both  these corrntrres.  '"Yorid politics has surr en(iL,red to the rnarket and srnce market  iras povrer actions of  v-arrous countries are  decrded by the market  forces. Secondly,  economic and military  Fower is shrfting from  West to Asia. ln the  rrear future greater  Cheen (China, Hong  Kong, Bangkok) will  emerge as a formidable super power And  to balance this super  power there will be  subcontinent power. 
  Q.What would be 
He left Paxistan in 11i77 r.rl'ierr it irecarne drffi
cult to prodlrce horrest. creatlve prograrrlrltes  on Lahore I V freely and tnen pernranently scr  tied in Srr,reoen.and for" ilris he has come {li)  with a ne'rt iheory of proetic syslem and lv::rrls  to study tite [-ri:cla rri i:'tirjab. F{e feels f.:oetrv  being cultirral systrnr snould be relnterprelecl  Bcrn on npril 15. 1948, Asrf wrlnt ttu  frrrson in 1971 y7i:sr1 he sLroke anci wrr;ie i:cenis agitr"lst killrrrqs.:n [Salrgladesh. lfri:,r ire  i:ecan-le a producer ori Lahore -IV. 'Urrra L;i'r.;,;,  Flalra Par' arrd'[t4pri r;rrrrlli nr;tcldni L.alrwa r,<-,r,I  tnein chan-cirtur drrri r-idh:i' are s;onre popuiur"  sollgs prodttcerl l-ry i11i1r  Hc leurnt :i!'/cdtsh film science alrd dis,  COVere.l tllil ;) irn\rl i;tiCtr:rlV ivas enterging r)n  the interrr;:ttriirr;rl sriorte ilre lrtformation sc,-:r.ety ln crt.-(.f ii) frr.ld ilti)re ,rtid rrti-rre abcrut lf ris  rlew S(iclel:,, tlt: be1lan t0 l(rarn t;0nillUler Sys.  tenrs. Tlteri hi: tr-rtnect rlrlo a bl;siiri:sr; rir.rrr..  started his own tlotiier: t.lrilirr stotes itt':;,il:..t.::,1  tha,t rtrarket;ng is ,rs lrnporlant as, lt-r, ';, ,il,ri  or arr iult:a ire Si;iri his bttt.rrtesi (il:u !,'r',,',,'l  into intcrnatrorrai nrarketing i' ; l 
this sub-continent power ? 
  Bangladesh shall form a unlt ,:lr i{-l i"loi iid  be known as subcontinent'pov',,r:r 'W+stern econonrists alrd exper-ts on rnter  national relations have caii:ll;rleC f triil':  by the year 2O2O Chin;i i^;rii $s '.r.,io lLr  three times richer than tlir USA ir,iith 
  i$t'{f..'tmr'  t':': its population touching hundred.million  , it will be the biggest 6snsumer,power.  ,r On the other nanO population of the subcontinent too wilt increase and'with sustained economic development they will  counter the Chinese power. 
a Till nowpopulation has beenseen  as a negative factor, rather a hindrance for ecoiromic development.  Since Asia, including China, lndia and  Fakistan are considered,over-populated' how can we say they would be  a threat to the so called-.developed'  nations?  It is true that population till now was a  negative factor. but by the next decade  this same population number will becotre a positive factor. There is a very  sound logic behind this. ln the west conqumjng ability has reached a saturation  poin! People over there cannot be coerced to consume any more. Advertisement and all other market tools have  been used to the maximum and have  now almost exhausted in creating more  ' GonsurTlers. At the same time they are  going on producing more and more consumer goods thus they require markets.  For that they will come to Asia. 
alter allthat. There will be a"universality  never seen before. For how long the feudal forceswill survive? Politiciins *ay  have whateverfaces on either side, economic compulsions will make them see  reason and disiolve'petty hatred. tt  should not come as a surprise that teaders of both lndia and Pakistan decide  to abolish border in the near future. As  I see it there will be no custom duty, no  visa and tradewillbe encouraged. people will 
:  be able to see each other face to face  and the feelings of hate emerging from  ' .an "unseen abstract enemity" shall  evaporate. Common sense shall pre_ vail and boundaries will be dissolved.  Q. Who will take the initiative? Atready many afrempb have been made  and hav6 failed. Besides thefe are  some sensitive issues like'Kashmir  involved in which it is more of prestige on the either side which. is at  stake. So which politician will take the  risk of initiating the process?  lnitiatives have already begun. As I said  earlier, economic compulsions will rule  the politicians. Be it Gujaral, Nawaz  Sharif oranyoneelse, they might belong 
Q. But is it possibte for ittiterate, poor l"^.?lY^":1":r their decisions will  peopre suifering many diseases to 11:lo.b."thesame.Atthe interLuy'such proOuitse national level the inevitability of  Wiit arrd see. Our politicians will have lit ^!l?. already been realizedto change their prefere,nces roon. tttr- Conflict scares investors and bejor chanles will have to be brougnt aoout 31-"-t negative forforeign investiot acqulring literacy and better "or.r- 1e1ts Political stability, amity  tion opportr]nities. This one tactor wiit and sound infrastructure are a neatter the employment and heatth .."n". ;""Tl,rJ:lhs'rr#,: *i.;:?:,$n are 
Q. Asia is fragmented on retigious y:.:.9i19-ilaroe chunk of their budget  lines. There ri" r"ny other differ- IT?ondefenceinsteadofoneducaences too. So where do you """ tt " y:']T now with a shift in business of  unity in ttre regionz ,'.v weapon industry to other spheles in  unity or more irury peace is a neces- Y::'::?Tentration willbe qn maximum  sitv' rhe new stosan for internatiollt ffi:i.l['ft1] ffi,?iffiXilil",".tffI  business is "Peace is good for business ning in a toss and no one wants it to be .  and from this perspective conflict can- ;;;'.;;;;;,;ji;ffiffi{il. ;'J,.,:"  t:ii:.Uil,1[f, :i ii : xH ffff5tt ;w';'"",5'ln,ti.:i:i,#i:  :ffi,?,l':?,1,:',#::i,:"[i*iil:##;i;yi:Xim,3;t.truj;"g*  -,_---'r'--.  q r:;) lrlol"€ and more efficient ways of aCgofn- '  , plishing the tasks. Uneducated people  can not handle such work and if 'that  technology has to be transferred to lndia and Pakistan education is inevitable. A European proverb says 'one fo6t  in work and one foot in the ctass room'  i.e. education is a life long process. Besides, in the West education is seen as  a pro(uct and hot as a virtue. As I said  eartier, literacy and high-tech education  is one factor which will make,a[ the 
,, S,tange.-,This'will bring about another  , t |$f,,:t revolution unfathomed yet,  Q. How can masses in both these  countries (lndia and Pakistan) be educated at such a rapid rate and what  of social, conventions.  This is alla political game which will have  to change now. Again the leaders of both  countries will have to re-think their strategies. Education cgsts and this cost will  have to be borne by money from various sources including the defence expenditure. Education will bfing enlightenment, people will get consciousness.  Communal differences will become  weak and then stronger forces for ail  round development will emerge. 
Q. lsn't it utopian?  Not at all. You witl see how gradually  systems will change and make space  for the right shape of capitatism to  emerge. Tolerance and harmony will  become a necessity. 
 
Q. So, canwe hopefordisappearance  of the barbed wire?  lndeed. Barbed wire will vanish as nuclear arms factor is becoming very important. lt coutd develop into i catastro  ptie which either side cannot afford.  Jhele- are some otherfactors as well. tn  . nelr future,the region,. including middle  , €ds[,.v.vil! beeome a big,market.'Middle  eastrhag,"worldid only gas and oit resoufces. Vlestern countries and uSA,  .th'e ricftqst in the woild, would wish to  dxploit,them to the maximum extent. Due  ,to geo-political conditions this can only  '.be nirq"gsible through Pakistan. Since  USA and European countries will be  ' spending on these products they would  like to get back the money. f-gr this all;  efforts will be made to convgit illiterate  urideveloped society into;'ionsumers :  w.!th purchase powerwhoBpn buy goods  produced in USA a1d Eqlgpe- Some of  these consumer products will be mantr-.  factured in lndia py multi-nationals and  would pass through Pakistan to the middle east. Passage of goods is.only possible if situation between neighbouring 
countries is congenial. ln the longer run  Pakistan will become a middleman  which will hike the price of the product  'and it wiluld be better if there are no  trade restrictions between India and  Pakistan to avoid unnecessary tax-tariff, custom duties etc. 
Q. lsn't there any. danger of regionalism then?  I fbel that with money and technology  all regions will develop. 
  Q. What about Punjab? ls there anY  speciql role for it in this scenario?  Punjab, both West and East, will have a  very important rolq. ln fact the next decades are for this region. ln lndian Punjab agricultura! development has  touched an alltime high and in the Punjab on the Pakistan's side, i.e. Western  Punjab, ihdustrialization has made the  local economy stronger. When both  these will be combined there will be no  looking back for this region. lt will  emerge as an economic force to be reckoned"with. That is why politicians will  have to take steps in the right direction.  They will have to sit across the table and  find solutions to petty problems and take  major decisions in the interest of greater  humanity. 
Q. How do you find a parallelwith the  Berlin war?  ln Germany also some similar issues  were faced. ln this region China and Pakistan will not lift the border because  there is so much cultural difference but  it is podsible for lndia and Pakistan since  there is a social, cultural and linguist continuity. 
Q. lsn't lndia's condition different  from Germany's?  Some differences are definitely there.  There is socialdemocracy in lndia. Secondly there is a strong trade union culture here but now lndia is not facing any  labour problem and for any economy to  develop, peaceful industrial relations are  very essential.  Q. So do you visualise a Western  style development here? Doesn't that  mean we shall be invitin$ woes of that  society also?  Development here has never been on  thewestern line norwill it be. ln the West,  alienation has emerged and that is why  they are turning to eastern pattern of  spiritualism. Our society will not have the  same irnpact of development since we  have the western example in front of us  and the Asians will have to be very foolish to imitate the west and invite the 
chaos of that ,society. I am  ',confident thdi'qeithlr: Pa- .  ' kistanis nor lndians are that  foolish. We will have our  own styte and pace of eco- ,  nomic and cultural growth.  Time is a majorfactor here. ,  : 
Q. I am still not clear as  to how this will help in  removing the border.  See growth and development means higher inter- I  action. Through mass com- '  munication the borders  have already been shattered. ln our two countries  the unseen abstract factor ,  is very important. lt is hu- I  man nature that the mo-'  ment we see the enemy in ,  flesh and blood and find"  him/her very much like us the hatred  disappears. Now you have seen me, do  you hate me? You know me as any other  person. There was an iron curtain earlier  but now that windows have oPened  through TV screen/radio. Wait; when the  real impact of internet will become evident,  the contact will be direct then. There will  be no politicians giving their own hues and  shades.  I am sure that in ten years from now  the mental border will totally vanish. The  change process is moving fast and fast,  means of communication has made life and  exchange much faster. Technology's impact can be seen in building construction  which is much faster now. Same is true of  road, air or railtransport. So who can stop  the wave of change? 
Q. You seem very sure and enthusiastic but what about indifferent politicians  and ineffective administration?  lf politicians have to survive they have to  play their game fairly and provide effective administration minus corruption. After  all politicians are also aware of the world  Situation today. A politician works for the  market. There is no force which can stop  it.  l-et me return to China now. China  is a nationalist country. They have the capital as well as knowhow. We have the knowhow but we do not have the means to use  that knowhow. After allwho are the scientists in the USA but Asians giving alt the  technical development to that country and  making it a super power? Our nations are  not ready for them yet but when the right  time will come and the situation will change  not only we will be able to absorb the nationaltalent more but those who have gone  too will come back. Mind you this is not  just a hope but a very well calculated doc
trine which I am soon going to publish in  my book. Some of these ideas have been  written and published also. I am regularly  writing in Jung the biggest daily of Pakistan on these topics. 
  Q. Again I come back to my apprehensions about the world market especially  the role of international trade organizations in the form of controls by IMF and  WTO which lfeel are big hurdles in making the sub-continent any power at all? 
  World Trade Organization is based on  free trade. lts policies are not against subcontinet. As faras protected entrepreneur  is concerned there is no economic growth  .possible,with such policies hence in any  case these have to be abolished. On the  other hand any industrialist who believes  in competition  considers it fair. Capitalism does not believe in protectionism and parasites remember these factors. They are a burden for national economy. The protective  entrepreneur will have to find ways and  allow for competition otherwise our nations will be isolated. Economic growth is  possible only under capitalism and since  communism has as yet failed we have to  flnd.otherways and means to overcome  social inequalities.  As far as world economics is  concerned export is main threshold.  Lei our nations produce quality goods  ahd compete. We still have time to use  cheap labour and cheap transport so  we have time to coBe up with the developed economies ftt. 
(Photographs by:- Dr. J.P;S.,Jolly) 
 


Continue Reading | comments

VADH BACHEY

What's New?

Issue 8

Issue xix

 

Punjab Monitor