Showing posts with label 5. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 5. Show all posts

K.L.SAIGAL

Friday, 28 June 2013


 THE MELANCHOLIC MELODY LIVES ON -K.L.SEHGAL
  His name is synonymous with rhythmic, light classical film songs of 1930s and 40s In fact the moment one mentions 'Saigal', songs like ‘Ek bangla bane nyara' echo in one's heart. A singer with music in his veins and honey on his tongue. Kundan Lal Saigal literally sang his way into this world. Singing was such a passion with him that he drank himself to death just 'to sing and act better'. Using merely a harmonium and a pair of cymbals Saigal could produce the most scintillating melodies.
Saigal's popularity is it self a proof that masses of the time had an ear for quality music. All his songs and films were big hits. His knowledge of music and 'hauntingly melodious' voice even attracted the likes of Rabindranath Tagore to comment that 'his melody is not only correct but he perfectly  meaning'. AMRIK SINGH BARHOK had met Saigal on two occasions and profiles on this celebrated singer of yesteryears whose songs still stir many souls. 
On Jan. 18,1947a legend parted company with the mortal souls only to become immortal in the heart of millions of his fans. Kundan Lal Saigal had finally left for 'Nayeehar' leaving indelible impressions behind. Born on April 4, 1904 at Jammu to Amar Chand and Kesar Kaur, in a middle class family from Jalandhar Saigal was a natural artist. After his schooling Saigal moved to Lahore where he found himself a modest job with a company, at a meagre monthly salary of 50 rupees. He, however, was not satisfied and accepted the job to keep the wolf from the  door.'  Music was in Saigal's veins. Furthermore, he had a profound sense of humour, and was easy to get along with, though some say he tended to be moody. But no one denies that he was a happy go lucky fellow.
 It was in 1931-32 that Saigal was spotted reciting one of his most favourite songs  "Jhulana Jhulayen...." at a small, private gathering. His discoverer was Mr. Wali, who had by then made name for story and dialogue writing. He had also directed two or three films Wali liked Saigal's enchanting voice, and his flawless diction of Urdu words. A few days later, Wali invited Saigal to his studio and asked him if he was interested in films or in singing. Saigal's answer, predictably, was yes Hardly a fortnight had elapsed when Wali again set for Saigal. One of the New Theatres big bosses was in Lahore and was staying with Wali as his guest. Wali, it may be mentioned, married Mumtaz Shanti the heroine of a Punjabi film, "Sohni Kumharan", which broke all previous records in the country. The record was  only nearly matched, two years later, by a Hindi film 'Kismet' made by Bombay Talkies. His films interestingly, also featured Mumtaz Shanti in the lead role. Wali and Saigal sang the same song ('Jhulana Jhulayen') for the benefit of the New Theatre functionary.' The visitor from Calcutta was greatly impressed. The following day, a contract was signed between the singer and the company. It was for a period of five years, in the first instance. The salary, however, was very meagre.
The end of 1932 saw the release of Saigal's first film with New Theatres. It was titled "Mohabbat Ke Aansu" (The Tears of Love) and was directed by P. Ttorihy (?). Two years later, in 1934, 'Chandidas' was released. It was directed by Nitin Bose. "Devdas" directed by P C. Barua came in 1935. The film featured Jamuna {who had been discovered by Barua himself). She was cast in the role of "Paro". the heroine of the movie. This film caused one of the biggest stirs in the history of Indian Cinema. It became a super hit. The impact was so great that both Jamuna and Saigal became synonymous with 'Paro' and 'Devdas', respectively. The film ends on a tragic note. Saigal drinks himself to death following the heroine's refusal or inability to reciprocate his amorous advances. Two of this film's songs, "Balam aye baso mere man mein ..." and "Dukh ke din ab bitat nahin" became all time hits. Both Jamuna and Saigal had been catapulted into the dizzy heights of superstardom. The film director, P.C. Barua Iater married the actress.
Although Saigal had almost permanently settled down in Calcutta ,he never thought of severing his umbilical cord with Punjab. At least once every year he would visit Punjab to meet his relatives in Jalandhar and his fans and admirers in Lahore. Lahore, then, had acquired the reputation of being the touchstone of lndian films because of the enthusiastic reception of the good films.
 Anywhere else in those days, play back singing was not heard of. Understandably, actors who could sing beautifully were preferred. New Theatres had three of the most popular singers  Pahari Sanyal, KC. Dey (father of the celebrated singer. Manna Dey), and Saigal himself. K C DeY was called the "Blind Singer" because of the blindness in both his eyes Singing was considered very important for films. Romances were popular even then but mostly good, clean films were produced.
 Saigal had PlaYed in almost all kinds of films  romantic, social, musical, mythological, religious, and historical. And in almost all films, he played the title role. For instance, in 'Chandidas' he played Chandidas. In 'Devdas' he played Devdas, ln 'Tansen' he plaYed Tansen, and in 'shahjehan' he played Shahjehan. None of his films flopped. As a matter of fact, Saigal's presence in a film was an insurance against possible failure. In 'Tansen' Saigal was paired with one of the leading actresses of the day  Khurshid Begum. She was the film's heroine. Her song "Pahle jo mohabbat se inkar kiya hota……". became an instant hit. Its haunting tune was hummed by lovers of music for years to follow. Saigal himself gave several songs  all hits.
Saigal's 'shahjehan' was both a historlcal as well as musical. The film had some of the finest songs Those which are heard very often on the 'All lndia Radio', include. "Chaah barbad kare gi, humen maisom na tha", "Sham dive mustaggil, 'kitna nazuk hai dil", "Toot gaye sab sapne mere", and "ab ji kar kya karen ge, jab dil hi toot gaya". "shahjehan" was Saigal's last film.
Saigal played a wide range of roles in a variety of films. He tried two or three comedies  President' and 'Karorpati', but it was in the tragic roles that the actor excelled. Indeed, he Was 'tragedy', personified. Saigal must be given credit for introducing 'society' girls to the screen, although Pune's "Prabhat Film Company" had also, about the same time introduced quite a number of talented girls from affluent families.  Nalini Tarkhud and Shanta Apte, to mention just two of them In "President" he was paired with two new heroines  both from rich and sophisticated families. They were Leela Desai and Kamlesh Kumari. In the movie both the girls are sisters and are in love with the hero (Saigal). One of the film's songs "lk bangla baney nyara" is still as fresh and popular as it was half a century ago. 
The 'New Theatres' were known for quality and not quantity. They made just one film a year, on an average. Saigal faith fully stood by the company until he himself called a day. Saigal did not last long on the film scene. But, as long as he was on the screen, he shone like the 'Pole Star' dominating the cine scene. His supremacy was not challenged until he himself chose to withdraw from the field In about fifteen year period of this star in the industry, Saigal appeared in about a dozen and half films. Other films in which Saigal appeared include "street Singer", "Dushman", "Meri Bahen", and "KarwaneHayat" (The Cara van of Life) In this film, Saigal is a member of a nomadic tribe which is perpetually on the move travelling by day; and halting by a suitable site by night. This film had one of Saigal's most enchanting songs, "Hazrate nazara aakhir ban gayee rehnaivan" It was a tragic song, sung in a group, The carefree and happy go lucky members of the party, including two young girls sing and dance in amazing abandon and uninhibitedness.

A special feature of Saigal's singing was that he needed only a harmonium and a pair of cymbals to produce the most scintillating melodies In fact, there were no Laxmi kant PYare lals or Shankar Jai kishans at that time. Nor were elaborate orchestras used.
I had the opportunity and privilege of meeting the superstar twice in the forties. The first time we met was at a public reception held to welcome at the vast ground near 'Gurdwara Dera Sahib' and the Red Fort (Lahore). The sec ond time we met was at a common friend's house (also at Lahore). I asked the actor, why he drank excessively if not horribly, he replied: "To sing and act better." "Drinking does not detract from the quality of my singing or acting," he quipped. "On the contrary," he added, "it helps to get the best out of me." ln support of this contention, he cited the case of his musical, street singer, which turned Kanan Bala, a   very gifted actress and songstress of all times. I would have to compete with Kanan, who is a reputed singer. It posed a challenge for me I, therefore, drank heavily before each of my song was filmed or recorded," the actor confided. This reminds me of the famous lines of Winston Churchill, who once declared: "l have taken more out of drinking than it has taken out of me."
Among Saigal's religious films, the more notable were "Puran Bhagat" and "Surdas". Saigal is also remembered as a trendsetter, in that with his emergence as a singer performer, the popularity of stunt films began to decline, giving way to soft, sentimental and emotional types of films. Although Saigal's singing repertoire was amazingly wide and varied, ghazal was his 'forte' In most of his films, he played a' disappointed, rejected, or jilted lover, or a victim of unacknowledged love. Understandably' the songs or ghazals he sang had a touch of agony and pathos. Was he a victim of unrequitted love in real life too? Many are convinced he was. We all know he drank himself to death. Saigal is no more with us, but his memory always is. His tragic songs have immortalised him, just as he has immortalised the' New Theatres' (the company he worked for, lived for, and died for).

Continue Reading | comments

WHAT IF NO OLYMPIC MEDAL WE PRODUCE BEAUTY QUEENS

Thursday, 27 June 2013

WHAT IF NO OLYMPIC MEDAL

Add caption

WE PRODUCE THE BEAUTY QUEENS

Hindutava or RSS  mindset people feel the world is jealous of India the world power and that is why India is discriminated against globally. See what they think…
Our unique ancient science is yet to be recognized by the world . What the scientists are doing today we did it 5,000 years ago.  We had pushap vimanas what the world has today in the form of jet airplanes. Because we are different people and different from the rest. The West has stolen our ancient books and they are getting ideas from those. Look what u can do without digit zero (0) invented by ancient Indian mathematicians.
It is surely the indifferent and discriminatory attitude of the Olympic Committee that they deliberately ignore the events where we excel: of laziness, dishonesty, corruption, casteism, communal violence, genocide of minorities, and caste wars. Sad no notice of us is being taken of or acknowledged or accepted as an event. To encourage Olympics what have we not done? Did we not give give  P.T Usha, Milkha Singh etc. the honours of winners of Olympic Gold medals while they had missed even the bronze. Discrimination….
Thank God now at last the world has come to realize our leg power. It is not just a days of pursuit though It took us years. We are proud of our Sushmita Sen, Aishvarya , Diana Hayden, Lara Duttas and are destined to produce many such Beauty  Queens. Can any country match our effort on this event: our  competitions namely Miss Street, Miss City, Miss State, Miss lndia and then with heads held high we throw challenge at Miss World and then Miss Universe contests. Our future competitions will be Miss Cosmos and Miss Galaxy and Miss lnfinite and so  on.
We, as you know produce biggest number of films in the world and none would be complete if some 'Prem Kahani' or Love story is not depicted. What ever the action our brave lndians out-rightly reject any show which  does not have some sex appeal in it.
We hate such cultures which promote work culture. Stupid isn’t it ‘Work is Worship'?  If we have got a little amount of money we need not work at all. We get , those 'very active' servants from Bihar, Orissa etc. who would work just for , Rs. 500 or 1000 a month : we have a culture in which one man works and feeds' ten mouths'. It is a matter of pride that about 90% of our girls are busy in , nail growing mission. Their families take pride in it and would help them grow then to ‘some  honourable  length’. What more discriminatory treatment of the Olympics could be that they have not added or acknowledged it as an Olympic event.
We are proud of our Bathinda district of the Punjab where the liquor consumption is more than the consumption of many countries put together. Even the consumption is more than that of the whole of UP state. Should there be any fall in the liquor consumption, it adversely affects on the Govts and Govt might fall. ls not our economy unique ?
On the front of illiteracy, we are number one. Why should we produce more educated people as they start demanding one thing after other. Who will give them jobs? Ours is a  closed door economy. Why should we open our doors to the world? Interaction with the world and our whole unique character is lost. Interaction with the world and we are in danger ‘desh ki akhandta ko khatra ho jata’.We don't want any inroads into our unique culture. Our caste culture is well founded and don't you know even our 'Father of Nation’ (Mahatma Gandhi) used to take pride in it and would justify casteism. Doesn’t our intellectuals defend it every now and then? We are proud of our heritage.  Mera Bharat mahan.
Continue Reading | comments

CENTRAL OFFICES VIOLATING LANGUAGE POLICY

Wednesday, 26 June 2013

CENTRAL OFFICES IN PUNJAB ARE VIOLATING LANGUAGE POLICY OF GOVT


To keep the Punjabis divided the Govt of India took a leaf from British colonial administration. Since Arya Samaj had opposed Punjabi even in pre-Independence days the Govt considered to keep them divided on language issue. Though Punjabi speaking Punjab was carved out by diving the state in 1966 the Punjabi language still remains deprived of its due place in its home state. Communalism promoted by divisive policies of the Govt  gave rise to a secret  anti-Punjabi campaign depriving this language of the masses of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs became one of the most deprived, ignored and disowned languages of the world.
The saddest part of the story is that whatever provisions are available  for the  regional languages of the respective states or the Constitutional provisions or governmental orders, even these are also not being implemented in the state of the Punjab.
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT PUBLICITY (LANGUAGE) POLICY
The ministry of Home affairs has a well defined language policy as to give publicity through a particular language and for maintaining public relations. According to these provisions while carrying out the publicity, the government agencies “Will give preference to the regional language  followed by the State language i e. Hindi and then English.”
Now mark whether Punjabi is being given any place in Central Govt offices in Punjab? What to talk of giving the first place the language is more often than not completely ignored. Thus in reality however exactly the opposite to the Govt policy is happening. For example the sign boards at various places and outside government offices giving information are almost always in English or in Hindi. In most cases none exists in  the Punjabi language at all.
The only place of the Govt of India where Punjabi has been given place is the railway stations where surely the station boards are  definitely in Punjabi but other than that there is no place for this language. However if you enter the offices at the railway  stations  then again Punjabi missing: no where on the name plates of the officers or sections. The language is also conspicuous by its absence at various counters giving directions about the train or ticket bookings.
 A similar step-motherly treatment is given to the language of the Punjabi masses the announcement as to arrival or departure of the trains are seldom given in Punjabi. At some stations recorded announcement do give but the instant announcements are as a rule in Hindi. This is highly surprising since almost all other states use their regional language to impart such information.
Similarly the sign boards of the Army and the Air Force establishments in the Punjab do not give any place to Punjabi neither do  BSF, CRPF and  ITBP do for that matter.
The same is the case with  the Revenue offices like the lncome Tax and the Central Excise and Customs. No sign board in the Punjabi language exists there nor any stationary, forms etc  meant for, public usage are printed in Punjabi.
 Unfortunately the Labour Ministry  in the state too ignores the language and their respective departments do not have forms in Punjabi language although most of the applicants who come to them are conversant only with Punjabi and have no knowledge of either English or Hindi. This makes communication very difficult and leads to corruption and harassment thus the middlemen are born who liaison with office and the individual  as in the case ESI and Provident fund etc.  the Central  Labour Commissioner's Office.
The telephone offices now of course run recorded computer tapes sometimes while attending customer calls. Thus it shows where monetary aspects are concerned the trading Govt office can give place to Punjabi language. But the offices take no notice of the Govt instructions on language policy.
The telephones never thought of bringing out directories  in Punjabi, the way they exist in other states. The offices of the telecommunication department in the state too have no sign boards in Punjabi or, for that matter, neither has the post and telegraph department. The same is true of the Ministry of External Affairs offices in the Punjab which also neglects the language. An example is the passport application form which is either in English or in Hindi.
 DOORDARSHAN AND FILMS
Jalandhar Doordarshan’s Punjabi programmes are a worst. Half hearted attempts  of producing   programmes in Punjabi language create a havoc rendering either the programme a mess. Most of their anchors and compares come from  Hindi school background who speak Punjabi with Hindi accent. Mostly it re-casts programmes produced by other centres of Doordarshan thus promoting Hindi language among our village folks. As far as language aspect is concerned the news casting is satisfactory plus the Punjabi literary programmes.
A similar complaint, can  be registered against the Punjabi film industry also. The pathetic condition of the Punjabi films makes  one shameful.  Copy cat stories of themes of Hindi films with poor and overstressed dialogues. One wonders while the Punjabi heroes can dominate the Bollywood  how come their home movies are miserable? Surely incapable producers and directors. Also the  Sikhs feel , that their image is more often than not tarnished in these movies since the roles have Sikh names  but the actors are usually clean-shaven. Language wise  also the performance is miserable.
HOPELESS DAVP
  The Directorate of Advertising and Visual Publicity under the Ministry of information and Broadcasting is doing no good either. One feels it has translators from Delhi who know very little of Punjabi and often transliterate rather than translating into Punjabi.
 Only one or two advertisements are released to Punjabi news papers which is more in the nature of helping or winning  the newspapers than any genuine effort of sincere publicity. Most of the advertisements of the respective departments and ministries are released to the papers without translation and are therefore carried by the news papers in verbatim i.e. in English or in Hindi.
For example all  advertisements from the UPSC are carried by the Punjabi news papers in Hindi or in English. This is highly surprising since DAVP does have an army of translators and writers.
 In any case the DAVP ads in Doordarshan are often laughed at. Advertisements related to Family planning are a real mess since the actors  seem to be very uncomfortable in speaking Punjabi language. May be DAVP does not know dubbing. Almost always their  Hindi accent especially some Punjabi sounds seem foreign  to them like ghar (house) bhara (brother) etc.
PUNJABI PAPERS
 It is unfortunate that the language we advocate is not even written properly by those who, wish to keep its banner high i.e, the regional newspapers.  Language of the Punjabi news papers is often loaded with Sanskritised Hindi words as in vogue with Hindi papers. Daily Ajit does seem to be a bit cautious in this regard but going through Punjabi editions of the Tribune and Puniab Kesri it is often felt as if one  is reading Hindi through Gurmukhi script. . The  Centrat Goverurment' s advertisement policy to goes in the interest of Hindi or English papers. For: example a hoard of advertisements were released to Punjab Kesri while Ajit was deprived of them. The field reporters are often impressed by the TV news. They often tend to use the Hindi terms in their dispatches. It is the sub-editors job to check the language. We often see un-digestible Hindi words appearing in Punjabi newspapers. In matters of circulation it is the funds that carry weight and obviously the Punjabi news papers are fighting a losing battle against the Hindi papers.
SCHOOLS
 The position of the Punjabi language is miserable in the schools even in the state itself. Although the most spoken language, rather the language of every household in the state, it has failed to enjoy any status as the other regional languages do in their respective regions. In every other state study of the regional language is compulsory while in the Punjab this is not so. There the medium of instruction is also the regional language. The same rules are applicable to the Punjab as well but here giving in to the pressure of the DAV ideology, Hindi has emerged as the favourite medium of instruction besides English which is more prevalent among the states. Since past four five decades the governmnent is relaxing this  rule on a year to year basis and is evading implementation of the regional language. Besides Punjab Govt is very liberal in allowing permissions to schools to get them affiliated to central boards like the CBSE and ICSE. The result being Punjab has emerged the first state where largest percentage of schools have been affiliated to central boards. Virtually Punjab has become a bilinqual state and no  politician has enough courage to come to the rescue of Puniabi language. The result is that Hindi has become the spoken language of the school going children. In fact the schools  consider it below dignity to converse in their mother tongue Punjabi.
In DAV schools etc. the conversation is as a rule in Hindi. ln junior classes of the colleges the study of Punjabi as a subject is also being avoided. The students have option to study Punjabi culture as a subject against the study of Punjabi as a subject. Thus many go on to study the Punjabi culture in English rather than Study the language itself. In the end it can be remarked that Punjabis go to some other region, learn the language of that area but hesitate to speak their own language In contrast the migrant labourers from UP and the Hindi belt in Punjab maintain their Hindi instead of learning the local Punjabi. With time their numbers are increasing. This too is playing a role in making Punjabi a secondary language in its homeland as the Punjabi villager is seen conversing in Hindi with these migrants, though with difficulty, while the migrant workers make no effort to learn and speak Puniabi. As a result it can be envisaged that the third generation from today will be at home in Hindi even in the Punjabi heartland further pushing their own mother tongue to periphery.
Continue Reading | comments

FEDERAL INDIA

Saturday, 15 June 2013

COALITIONS IN THE CENTRE - INDIA HEADING TOWARDS FEDERALISM


The early man was settled in tribal groups where the fittest man was its head and ruler. There were inter-tribal conflicts, wars and invasions with the motive of plundering the property of the weak groups. This type of tribal governments were even there when Alexander invaded India some 2300 years ago. These tribal governments often collaborated with the neighbouring tribes for their mutual security and this collaboration is called federation which is considered by the political scientists as an ideal form of governance. 

1947 ਵੇਲੇ ਕੋਈ ਅਜਾਦੀ ਵਜਾਦੀ ਨਹੀ ਸੀ ਆਈ। ਸਿਰਫ ਹਕੂਮਤ ਬਦਲੀ (ਟਰਾਂਸਫਰ) ਸੀ। ਏਥੇ ਅੱਜ ਸਹੀ ਲੋਕਤੰਤਰ ਨਹੀ, ਠਗਣਾ ਲੋਕਤੰਤਰ ਹੈ। ਅਸਲੀ ਲੋਕਤੰਤਰ ਉਹ ਹੁੰਦਾ ਹੈ ਜਿਥੇ ਹਕੂਮਤ ਲੋਕਾਂ ਦੀ ਹੋਵੇ। ਪਰ ਭਾਰਤ ਵਿਚ ਤਾਂ ਹਕੂਮਤ ਦਿੱਲੀ ‘ਚ ਚੰਦ ਬੰਦਿਆਂ ਦੀ ਏ। ਭਾਰਤ ਵਿਚ ਪੰਚਾਇਤਾਂ, ਮੁਨਿਸਪਾਲਟੀਆਂ ਕੋਲ ਅਸਲੀ ਤਾਕਤ ਨਹੀ ਹੈ। ਹੋਰ ਤੇ ਹੋਰ ਸੂਬੇ ਵੀ ਤਾਕਤ ਪੱਖੋ ਖੋਖਲੇ ਨੇ। ਹਾਂ ਸੂਬਿਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਪੁਲਿਸ ਜਰੂਰ ਦੇ ਰੱਖੀ ਹੈ ਤਾਂ ਕਿ ਭਰਮ ਭਾਅ ਬਣਿਆਂ ਰਹੇ। ਅਸਲੀ (ਅੰਗਰੇਜ ਵਾਲੀ) ਤਾਕਤ ਕੇਂਦਰ ਕੋਲ ਹੈ। ਹਾਸੇ ਵਾਲੀ ਗਲ ਤੁਹਾਨੂੰ ਦਸੀਏ ਕਿ ਅਮਰੀਕਾ ਦੀ ਕਿਸੇ ਮੁਨਿਸਪਾਲਿਟੀ ਕੋਲ ਜਿੰਨੀ ਤਾਕਤ ਹੈ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਸਰਕਾਰ ਕੋਲ ਓਨੀ ਵੀ ਨਹੀ। ਅਕਾਲੀ ਐਵੇ ਸੁੱਕੀਆਂ ਕੱਛਾਂ ਮਾਰਦੇ ਰਹਿੰਦੇ ਨੇ।ਪ੍ਰੋਫੈਸਰ ਰਸ਼ੀਦਉਦੀਨ ਖਾਂ ਨੇ ਕਿਤਾਬ ਲਿਖੀ ਸੀ (ਫੈਡਰਲ ਇੰਡੀਆ)  ਕਿ ਜੇ ਭਾਰਤ ਨੇ ਸੱਚ ਮੁੱਚ ਲੋਕਾਂ ਦੇ ਹੱਥ ਤਾਕਤ ਦੇਣੀ ਹੈ ਤਾਂ ਇਥੇ ਸੰਘੀ ਰਾਜ ਹੋਵੇ ਭਾਵ ਇਕਾਈਆਂ ਤਾਕਤਵਰ ਹੋਣ ਸੂਬੇ ਤਾਕਤਵਰ ਹੋਣ। ਕੇਂਦਰ ਕੋਲ ਸਿਰਫ ਫੌਜ, ਵਿਦੇਸ਼ ਮਾਮਲੇ, ਕਰੰਸੀ ਤੇ ਸੰਚਾਰ ਦੇ ਮਹਿਕਮੇ ਹੀ ਹੋਣ। ਅਸਾਂ ਉਸ ਦੀ ਕਿਤਾਬ ਦੇ ਅਧਾਰ ਤੇ ਇਹ ਅੰਗਰੇਜੀ ਵਿਚ ਲੇਖ 1998 ਵਿਚ ਲਿਖਿਆ ਸੀ। 

It was the earnest desire of the founding fathers of the Indian Constitution that the country would become a real republic i.e the governance by people themselves. Accordingly the founders gave certain guidelines to the future rulers of the independent India in the form of Directive Principles of State policy. They wished that the real power be transferred to the people themselves through the Panchayat or other local bodies. It is 50 years since India became independent now and the rulers have not moved an inch in this direction. The result is, more and more people are getting disgusted with the rule. Its reflection can be seen in the form of unrest in North-Eastern states, in Gorkhaland, the Caste wars, Uttrakhand, Jharkhand, Khalistan, Jammu and Kashmir, Babri retaliations, Tamils, Shiv Senas, Naxalism etc. The fact is today there is more violence against Delhi than it was before 1947 against the British. Its only reason is that the power has not been transferred to the local level. Governance is becoming more and more centralised and where ever and whenever people raised their voice for more powers these were termed by the rulers as secessionist overtones.
Those whose fathers and grand fathers fought the battle of independence are worried of its sustenance and preservation. Since the Congress which has virtually ruled the State for about half a century never paid any serious attention to the cries from the periphery. It always tried to harp on the subjects which were constitutionally under the jurisdiction of the States. As a result of which people have started preferring regional parties. Political analysts now agree that in future there would never be the single party rule in the centre, of course except in cases where the party or parties project popular personalities like film stars or some  other emotionally appealing personality. ln past two three occasions we have seen how government formation has been a difficult task but good sense prevailed and we found the coalition governments at the Centre. Now again if the Sonia/ Priyanka factor did not work, we will again have the same situation. If something is not done well in time we may witness some hung partiament resulting into a serious deadlock and elections again. But is it certain that even after elections people will return single parly?
The present government is perhaps a record where 13 regional parties joined hands together to form the government. The return of regional parties is a clear indication what the people want. If this country is to survive it will have to allow greater say to the states, and eventually pass on the power to the local bodies. It is an accepted fact that India is a canglomerate of various nations put together, so much so even the Chairman of the constituent Assembly Dr. Rajinder Prasad also admitted it. It is however different that the Assembly in spite of this fact, gave a highly centripetal constitution to India. Scholars agree that it was because of the Pakistan factor that they ignored the federal model of the government. They felt if the Muslim factor can keep many nationalities together under the Pakistani why not a unitary India where again people were bound with a religious factor. The pakistan experiment however could not last long and in 1971 one nation pulled out from it. We surely want that it should not happen to India and if it is to be kept intact, it will have to pass on the power to the people themselves. Religion always is not a sole factor to keep the countries united. Had it been that USSR would not have split or there would not have been many countries in the Middle East where again the religion is common lslam and Europe where the religion is predominantly Christianity.
Ideally it is the nations that voluntarily come together to form federations for reasons of security and trade. For example Switzerland Confederation was formed some 700 years ago when its units were threatened and it has survived for so long now. There are interesting examples when States would voluntarily come under the umbrella of a larger Nation for security reasons and  there are several examples in the Indian history itself. But only such federations have survived the test of time where the federations allowed greater autonomy to  its constituents.
 In India whosoever raised this voice was dubbed as the secessionist and rejected. The Akali agitation of the early Eighties is a glaring example. The Centre instead of loosening its hold on certain subjects rather tightened it further with the result the principle of governance by the people was further betrayed.
Today the States have less subjects in their list as compared with a local body in the US. The whole system is harshly disposed towards the states. Whatever amount of majority a party might have in the State Assembly the Centre has vast powers to dismiss the Provincial Government if it does not like it. It is not only in principle but the Centre has done it on several occasions. It dismissed the Telgu Desam Government of NTR, CPI (M) Government of Namboodripad. In fact there is a long list of such dismissals where the Centre engineered defections for the formation of governments of its own liking. Even if a State Assembly is allowed to complete its term it has very little to do in view of its limited jurisdiction and funds.
Today the Centre has a long list of 144 subjects to legislate upon (Union-97 and Concurrent-47) while the States have only a list of 66 items only, plus the Centre has residuary powers with it. Also there is a Veto in the hand of President in the case of an assembly bill. Except money bills the President can return the bill otherwise passed by the State Assembly. Major part of the taxation is with the Centre and there "no", defined law as to sharing of the taxes ' and the allocations are purely at the whim and fancy of the Centre. Also India has a unified Civil Services and all the officers like those IAS and IPS are recruited by the Centre and it imposes service restrictions as to the All India  Services Iike the Governor in the state capital its agents in the shape of IAS and IPS officers are watching the whole performance of the state government and obviously reporting to the Centre. Plus the centre has authority to impose the Emergency like it did in 1975 and suspend the Fundamental Rights. It has also the authority to impose Emergency in a particular State instead of whole of India. The Planning Commission again is not a statutory body and is under the direct control of the Cabinet. 'All this shows that India is a highly centralised democracy or the unitary system while a Republic has to be essentially a federal structure.
 Even otherwise also India has never been politically one as it is today. On, no occasion in history it was so much centralised as it is today, except for short period like the British rule of 1857 to 1947, or during the rules of Emperor Ashoka (D. 2328C) Sultan Allauddin  Khalji (D. 1316 AD) and Aurangzeb (D. 1707 AD) lt is also noteworthy that the South was never the part of India during the above Islamic rules. Even during the British Raj the local element was comparatively stronger. So much so there were 356 Princely States at the time of independence. The Ancient India was also regionally organised into the 'Janpaddas'. Vedas and Puranas have references to the existence of such Janpadas or the tribal territories. Vayu Purana gives a detailed account of 165 'Janapadas of Bharatvarsha'. Those 165 Janpadas were constituted under seven major regions or the greater provinces like the 1. Udichya -Eastern, 2.North Western region, 3.Madhya Desha-Central region, 4.Apparanta-Western region, 5.Prachya -Eastern, 6.Dakshinapatha Southern, 7.Vindhyan and the 8.Mountain region. In that ancient India even Afghanistan was part of the Greater India what to talk of Bangla Desh and Pakistan. The janapadas were all Republics in themselves yet there was interaction between them. It was perhaps a perfect model of the federal system.
Just for the amusement of our readers some of the janapads of North and western regions were : Kekays, Shudra, Sindhu, Vahlika, Harpurika, Sakadriha. Madarika, Gandhara, Yavana etc. Interestingly those divisions were based on some logic or some common sense.
Even the Indian administration has acknowledged it that the smaller States are better manageable and its managers often cite the case of Haryana. Ironically the Indian Union which is highly centralised is even larger than more than 170 countries of the world with its 15th position-on the Globe. Except China and perhaps Russia rest of the States which are larger than India have the federal 'type of set-up. India which has 25 States and 6 Union Territories out of which 12 of its States or provinces are even larger than 100 Sovereign countries of the world. Uttar Pardesh with a population of 112 million is even bigger than Bangladesh (103.2 million) and Pakistan (100 million) which themselves are the seventh and eighth largest states of the worid. Similarly the position of Bihar (70 million), Maharashtra (63 million), Andhra Pradesh (54 million), Tamilnadu (49 million), have population individually egual to some. of the larger countries of. the world, like ltaly-57 million, U.K-57, France-55, Phillipines-57, Thailand-53,, Egypt-50, lran-45. Turkey-S1 Canada 26,. Thus India should have atleast 200 provinces if 'the country is to be administred properly and if it is to be formed a true Republic for example those 425 districts of India which are presently the administrative and control units of thd Centre and the Sta{es shoulci be.turnddintd some sorl of locit Sdtf governments with much of the planning decentralised.
janapadas in ancient india from Rashiduddin's Federal India: A design for change




An eminent professor Rasheeduddin Khan who is Internationally reputed and was twice nominated to Rajya Sabha and represented India in the UN General Assembly (1969) and a member of ICSSR, after a thorough study of the, Indian social pattern noted that, "India is thus a continental polity constituted into a single territorial sovereignty. These diversities in India based on religion and caste, language and dialects, cultural patterns, regional pulls etc. are as big in their physical distribution and dimensions as also in their distinctiveness as are normally the hallmark of separate nations. "Prof. Rasheeduddin who attributes the cause of too much centralised India to the urgent urge for national unity underlined by the trauma of partition of the country and says that it was because of this reason that there is too much of bias in favour of greater centralisation of power and thus larger jurisdiction to the Centre. The Professor feels that historically it was the Transfer of Power and not essentially a complete independence to form a Republic. Writes he," Historically the Government of India is the successor of the highly centralised and authoritarian Viceregal Govt. Whose grandeur of power was a match to "the much cited Czarist autocracy of imperial Russia." On the day of Independence the highly powerful Centre was transferred to the Congress. He says,"We should remember that the constitution of India is not a basic agreement between federating units that were previously independent in status but on the contrary a fundamentally made and enforced by a central authority, in the name of people which alone had created the units. To i remedy the rot and to save tfris great country from chaos Prof. Khan has enlisted some of the radical suggestions mooted by some political parties and individuals for immediate consideration:
1.    Constitution be amended so that the residuary powers are with the States instead of the Centre (article 248)
2.    Article 249 be deleted which gives the power to parliament to legislate on the subjects which are on the states list.
3.    Provision of 75% of total revenue to the states. (article-280)
4.     Delete article 302 which empowers parliament to impose restrictions on trade and commerce with a state or, between the states.
5.    Delete articles 356 and 357 the  emergency provisions giving right to the Centre to dissolve a Assembly and impose Presidential rule.
6.    Delete article 360 which empowers the President to interfere in a state administration  on grounds of threat of financial emergency.
7.    Delete article 200 and 201 which empowers the Governor to withhold the assent to bill.
8.    Amend article 3 to ensure that the name and area of state cannot be, changed without the consent of the State Assembly.
9.     Article 370 be not touched and, the demand of BJP and its allies be ignored.
10.    Article 368 be amended so that no amendment to the Constitution is possible without 2/3 majority.
The above suggestions are of course in addition to the recommendations of the Sarkaria Commission. Prof khan has also enlisted some 6 more, proposals as under:
1.     The centre should retain only such portfolio as Defence, Foreign Affairs, Foreign Trade, Currency, Communications, etc.
2.    The States should be adequately represented on the National Development Council,(NDC)
3.    The NDC and Planning Commission should have statutory powers.
4.    All India services like the IAS, lFS, IPS etc. be abolished and only the Union services and the State services should exist.' Further Centre should not have any, jurisdiction over the personal of state governments.
5.    Seventh schedule and the three lists should be suitably amended to give greater autonomy to states.
6.    To ensure the basic federal principle of equality, federating states should have equal representation to Rajya Sabha (and Lok Sabha also) however there could be exception to States and territories with very small population.
7.    Before this, however the following issues and suggestions should also be considered;
 (i) Territorial reorganisation of states on the criterian of providing to states maximum homogeneity within and maximum identity without   on the five principles of
(a) Socio-cultural affinity in terms of language, dialects, beliefs, religious communities and historical memories,
(b) Ethnic similarity, caste, tribe etc,
(c) Administrative manageability in terms of economy and population,
 (d) Distinct patterns of economy,
(e) Size of the State commensurate. with the need for closer contact between the voters and their representatives. In brief the main concern should be to create States which are socioculturally, homogeneous and administratively and politically manageable. ..
 (ii),Activation bf the Punchayati Raj and Nagarpalika system with necessary devolution of authority to build active grass-roots democracy.


Continue Reading | comments

GREY HAIR

GREY HAIR - SNOW ON THE ROOF DOESN'T MEAN THERE IS NOT FIRE IN THE FURNACE
by Lowel Ponte


Continue Reading | comments

VADH BACHEY

What's New?

Issue 8

Issue xix

 

Punjab Monitor