Showing posts with label Facebook. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Facebook. Show all posts

HOW WOULD GILL KILL THE BOYS

Sunday, 28 May 2017

ਕਿਵੇ ਮੁੰਡਿਆਂ ਦਾ ਕਤਲਾਮ ਕੀਤਾ ਸੀ ਵਾਸ਼ਨਾ ਦੇ ਮਾਰੇ ਬੁੱਚੜ ਗਿਲ ਨੇ (ਅੰਗਰੇਜੀ ਵਿਚ)
FOR HIS SENSUOUS PLEASURES GILL HIJACKED  ENTIRE INDIAN  SET UP
ਕਿਸੇ ਮੁਸੀਬਤ ਨੂੰ ਹੱਲ ਕਰਨ ਲਈ ਤੁਸੀ ਕਿਹੜਾ ਤਰੀਕਾ ਆਪਣਾਉਦੇ ਹੋ ਇਸ ਤੋਂ ਤੁਹਾਡੇ ਕਰੈਕਟਰ ਦਾ ਪਤਾ ਲਗਦਾ ਹੈ।

A criminal in Police uniform DGP  K.P.S. Gill had weakness for 3 Ws. Unfortunately he was taken away from civil police (Assam Govt)  to CRPF. As a CRPF officer he had no direct contact with people because CRPF is deployed only at places where law and order are in threat. And he knew the weakness of  Hindu India that it would wish to maintain unity of India at any cost including mass scale killing. To escape from CRPF, Gill thus offered to Govt to carry out its written and unwritten command. Gill was thus handed over the command of Punjab police.
Continue Reading | comments (27)

WOMAN IN HINDUISM

Sunday, 7 February 2016

WOMAN IN HINDUISM
For those who say we worship woman as devi the goddess

For Sikhs we recently posted an update on Facebook quoting Guru Nanak where the Guru says that how can you condemn the woman who gave births to kings (and prophets and avatars.)
SHE GAVE BIRTH TO YOUR PROPHETS AND AVATARS, HOW CAN YOU CONDEMN WOMAN

We also quoted Tulsi Ramayana where the Acharya writes that a beast, a pet a shudra and the woman deserve to be reprimanded. At this some of our Hindu friends protested and said that the statement was an isolated case and that woman are fairly treated in Hinduism. "On the contrary they said "woman is worshipped in Hindu society as a devi the goddess". We request such friends to please see this article to see pitiable condition of woman and thus shed prejudice. It is our bias of Indian society which in fact is responsible for highest number of rapes in India. Thus we believe that actually it is these adamant people who are responsible for injustices to woman.
 (please click to enlarge this photo)


Baroda Gujrat Devdasis photographed a century ago

On the contrary we believe that Hindu scriptures have promoted rape. We believe this could be the reason for high incidence of rape in Indian society. While we admit that certain mythological women characters are worshipped but over all the condition of woman in Hindu society is far from being equal to man. We believe such writings as the following send a positive message among the masses and bring awareness of the modern values for creating humanitarian society. Look here where woman stands in Hindu society and think twice to blame others;-

Last surviving Devdasi of Jagan Nath puri

• Hindu scriptures treat women as a commodity, and equates them to animals.

• In Hinduism only the wife has to fast during Karvachauth but not the husband. 

• The wife has to wear Mangulsutra and apply Sindoor to signify that ‘She is the property of others’ just like a board is set up in an open land stating it’s owner but the husband has no such thing to wear. 

• If the girl is born in inauspicious months then she is termed as Manglik, and per this superstition the husband of such girl dies soon so she is made to marry a peepul tree or a dog but on the other hand there is no such thing for a man. 

• As per Hindu scripture the wife either has to lead a life of celibacy after the death of her husband or mount husband’s pyre on the other hand there is no such rule for husbands. The husband is free to marry another wife after the death of his wife and can marry many wives even when the wife is alive. 

• Only the son can light the funeral pyre of his parents while the daughter is barred from it.

• Sexuality was not a secret thing in Vedic period as it is evident from Hindu places of worship like Khajuraho, Ajanta, Ellora temples and scriptures like Kama Sutra and various other Hindu texts which openly spoke or showed pornography.

• Ashvamedha Yajna is a ritual performed by Queens (particularly by chief queen) for fertility and also to gain power in the kingdom. The Ashvamedha Yajna includes slaughtering the horse, then follows the  Queen’s intercourse with the horse, then the horse is cut into pieces and cooked.

Scriptures promoting Rape:

• Lord Krishna stole the clothes of women while they were bathing in the Yamuna river. He did so to tease them and for the pleasure of watching the beauty of their naked bodies. We hang miniature paintings of the same act in our homes proudly. The young men who grow up seeing this, or listening to the story told in an amused tone are bound to not find such an act abhorrent.

• Lord Shiva, who insisted on entering the bathing arena of Goddess Parvati and did so by killing a child who was keeping guard at the open door.

• We have gods who, for instance, have cut the nose and ear lobes of a woman who approached them professing her love (Lakshman is depicted as having done this to Shurpanakha), and yet we adore him and see him as a symbol of loyalty, sacrifice and righteous indignation.

• Sita became suspect in the eyes of Lord Rama and she was forced to commit suicide.

• Dropadi treated as commodity.

• That husband is her God of a wife.- Mahabharata Chapter 146 Anushasan Parv – Also Manusimrati has the same regulation for woman.

• Manu Smriti says: Never trust a woman. Never sit alone with a woman even if it may be your mother, she may tempt you. Do not sit alone with your daughter, she may tempt you. Do not sit alone with your sister, she may tempt you.

• Manu Smriti: “Na stree swadantriya marhathi”. “No liberty for women in society”.

• (Satapatha Brahmana 14:1:1:31) "but woman, the Sûdra, the dog, and the black bird (the crow), are untruth: he should not look at these, lest he should mingle excellence and sin, light and darkness, truth and untruth.”

• “Indra himself hath said, The mind of woman brooks not discipline, her intellect hath little weight.” -Rig Veda 8:33:17

• A wife which can't bear son be discarded - Satapatha Brahmana 5:3:1:13

• Don’t give liberty to women. They are not fit for independence -Manusmrti 9:2-4

• Commentary by Swami Shivananda, Rishikesh: "........Women and Sudras are debarred by social rules from the study of the Vedas. ...."

• From Tulsi Ramayana- Aranya Kanda, 5 A-B: Ansuya (Rishi Atri's wife) said to Sita: "A woman is impure by her very birth; but she attains a happy state by serving her lord (husband)".

• Valmiki Ramayana treats woman as slave to his husband.- various entries.

• "A woman who is separated from her husband cannot sustain her life." Ayodhaaya Kand - Valmiki Ramayana

• Devdasi Pratha – where the young girls were dedicated to temple lords and used by the powerful persons or kings who controlled the respective temple.

• Swami Dayanand in his book Satyarath Parkash on page 318 – Brahmin considered sex with shudra women equal to pilgrimage. Sex by Brahmin with a prostitute was also considered as pious.

• In Malabar Kerala when the king would marry a girl he would depute her to the priest's house for some nights. This practice was also witnessed by a European traveller (Voyages of Walthuma vol. 1, page14) as quoted by Sant Ram Visheshvaranand Hoshiarpur. 

• In olden days the kings would present young women to the temple priests. See the dialogue between the great dramatist Kalidas with his pupil Sampuran Aushapi. Here Kaladasa says that he eulogized the greek king Chandra Gupta and said that he belonged to the family of Raja Ram Chander of Ayudhia. The king was so pleased that he presented Kalidasa a girl with golden hair (obviously a european girl) (This is quoted by Rahul Sanskritayan in his book Volga to Ganga at page 232.

• A woman who has delivered baby is considered as impure by Hindus. Interestingly the span of impurity varies from caste to caste.

• A Hindu woman is supposed to fast during certain days of year for the benefit of her husband while there are no such fasts for husband to observe.

• Only the male Brahmin can be pujari at the temple. What to talk of doing the ritual the woman is not allowed to read the scripture.
Continue Reading | comments (2)

Kiran Bedi’s husband Brij Bedi passes away

Monday, 1 February 2016

Kiran Bedi’s husband Brij Bedi passes away

GURGAON, January 31, 2016
IANS

(Please also see Unhappy Husband of Kiran Bedi)

Brij Bedi, the husband of Kiran Bedi, India’s first woman IPS officer, died at a hospital in Gurgaon on Sunday after a brief illness, doctors said.

Brij Bedi was hospitalised on January 28 following kidney and breathing problems.

His condition deteriorated and he was shifted to the ICU. Doctors said he died around 11 am on Sunday.

A photographer and social activist, Brij Bedi ran a school in Amritsar for underprivileged children.

After his death, Kiran Bedi posted a series of tweets paying tributes to her husband.
"City of Amritsar lost a man who loved his city the most. One who gave all his life to the cause of the needy. We will carry (forward) his service.
"He loved his city, Amritsar. Worked passionately to make it better. He educated children of fathers lost to drugs.
"He was very concerned about the problem of drug addiction in Punjab. He was a courageous voice for several causes."
Once a part of social activist Anna Hazare`s team, Kiran Bedi was the chief ministerial face of the Bharatiya Janata Party in the 2015 Delhi assembly elections.

courtesy:
http://www.thehindu.com/
---------------------------------------
Continue Reading | comments

AKAL TAKHAT PANJ PIARAS DISTINCT FROM STREET PYARAS

Tuesday, 5 January 2016

AKAL TAKHAT PANJ PIARAS DISTINCT FROM STREET PYARAS

Where ever the Guru lived that place became the headquarter of Sikhs.  The first such Centre was Kartarpur sahib (Ravi). Later it got shifted to Khadoor sahib then Goindwal sahib,  Ramdaspur (Amritsar) and then Anandpur sahib.
During the days of Nanak the VI, need of a place was felt where the Sikhs could gather to discuss political, social and miscellaneous issues that confronted the Sikh society from time to time. The Guru thus raised a building which was later came to be known as Akal Takhat i.e the centre of Miri the political power while Harmander the Golden Temple the centre of piri the  spiritualism was already there.

After the Tenth Guru bestowed guruship on Granth sahib Amritsar became the headquarter or capital of Sikhism again because the Granth sahib stood already ceremoniously installed by the V Guru. Mind it in the absence of printing press there were few beeds the copies of the holy book available.
  Guru Granth the holy book is to be interpreted by Beloved Five the Panj Pyaras. Thus advice of Gurbani interpreted by Panj Pyaras who have offered their head to Panth and who are regularly in touch with Gurbani to keep their five evils of kam, krodh, lobh, moh and ahankar i.e the urge of sex, anger, greed, attachment and pride (collectively known as 'haumen' the ego) under check. (Sikhism believes that if a person eradicates his haumen the ego he stands merged with formless God.)
Making arrangements for future the Tenth Master would often give training to Sikhs as to how to confront the days to day issues. He made Panj Pyaras as supreme power. There are examples when Guru was himself penalized (awarded tankhah) by Panj Pyaras.
There are examples in history how the Sikh emperor Maharaja Ranjit Singh was punished by Panj Pyaras led by Akali Phoola Singh. We would here in after call the Panj Piaras of Akal Takhat the Real Panj Piaras or RPP for convenience and distinction.
In an effort to redefine their territory the greedy and over enthusiast politicians in the post 1947  years changed the constitution of Panj Pyara and included such granthis  from other far flung Indian places like Patna Sahib in Bihar, Hajur Sahib in Maharashtra and Anandpur sahib and Dam Dama sahib. They believed as if Akal Takhat Panj Pyaras had no powers beyond Amritsar while according to tradition the Akal Takhat Panj Pyaras were the real panch pardhan of entire Sikh nation. The Sikhs didn't object to the new constitution.  For convenience we will call them Political Panj Piaras (PPP).
Slowly such granthis came to be appointed as PPP who were considered faithful to the person who had control over the SGPC the Sikh elected body for management of historical Sikh shrines. Yet the order of PPP were faithfully obeyed by the Sikh nation. Will any body believe that influential quarters got person like Darshan Singh Ragi appointed to the PPP who is now openly opposing the Sikh concepts. Some Sikhs had objected to his nomination for they knew that Ragi was under influence of Govt of India.
India believed that this institution of Panj Pyaras was a parallel power-centre within India beyond Delhi. Also they believed that SGPC was a parallel Parliament. These two institutions thus became an eye sore for Delhi. India thus adopted a secret programme to first dilute these power centres and then finally finish them.
They first found a helping hand in Gurcharan Singh Tohra the head of SGPC. The democratic character was first annihilated. The Govt avoided annual elections of SGPC for 27 years to keep Tohra in saddle. Even those elected in the last term were not allowed to meet. Tohra would invite the general assembly once a year for an hour just to get Executive body nominated. Yet the Sikh nation tolerated it and obeyed the directive whenever it was issued. Through Tohra the Govt managed to get its own Jathedar appointed to the holy team of PPP.
But Tohra was a clever politician. Many a times the Govt might have wanted to give final blow to finish SGPC but Tohra managed to get it postponed every time. Similarly when the Congress was in power in Punjab they would use their influence to avoid that harsh blow in view of electoral reasons.
Around 2000 the Govt agencies through RSS created an organization on papers called Sehajdhari Federation. A case in High Court was filed seeking voting rights for such Sikhs who would not necessarily have intact hair and turban. The real idea was to get voting rights for non-Sikhs read Hindus. So that these institutions are finished and separate identity of Sikhs annihilated. The RSS had already got its secret supporters appointed in the SGPC executive. It appears that RSS made them agree to put forth a weak defence in the court so that the Sehajdhari could win. And it so happened. A case was also filed that the press be prevented to highlight this issue. They gave the plea that otherwise it would give impetus to separatism and thus militancy.  The old house was asked to manage the SGPC as a caretaker body.
Notwithstanding, in Sept. 2011 the Govt held election to constitute SGPC. The results were announced but the Govt refused to issue notification to constitute the house in view of the court verdict.
The SGPC technically appealed to the Supreme Court. The present head would naturally not wish that the verdict comes soon and it takes years in Supreme Court if both the parties are willing to delay the verdict. Thus democratic character of SGPC is finished.
CM Badal who is only faithful to his chair,family and RSS asked the elected members of SGPC to keep mum on the issue. As a result of which non of its about 190 members ever opened his mouth on non recognition of elected members. To keep them happy  they were allotted one or two shrines to interfere in their management without any written order. It thus amounts to bribe to silence an elected member. And it is going on since 2011. Thus the elected members have been made irrelevant. Now the ground is cleared to make the SGPC a board where the members would be nominated by Govt instead of election by Sikh sangat. So SGPC is finished.
But before it is finished formally the RSS got its one of the members appointed as the next head after President of SGPC. That too at a very high record salary.
The next institution on target was Panj Piaras (PPP). Quite often the Govt through its influences got damaging and sometimes non-sense hukamnamas the promulgations issued. Will any Sikh believe that the Panj Piaras not once but twice thrice issued firman that no new gurdwara be established. As a result of which the Akali leaders even started laying foundation stones of churches. As a matter of fact the Panj Piaras are the conscience of Sikh Sangat the congregation engaged in Naam the praises to God. Thus the order issued by Panj Piaras is considered as the order of Sangat. Naturally the Piaras are supposed to issue verdict on such issue which are widely debated upon in the sikh masses.
With BJP at the Centre and obedient Akali Govt in the state, the agencies became furious. May be they believed 'now or never'.
Already head of a Sikh sect at Sirsa had openly defied Sikhism to please RSS so that he can save himself from the criminal cases he was facing. There are about 6 murder cases, some rape cases and one case where some resident youth of the Dera were got sterile through surgery. The Sikhs always take any attack on humanity as an attack on Sikhism. Thus open confrontation started between the dera followers and Sikhs.
For RSS Now was the right time to act. It planned a strategy.
A hukamnama was got issued by the PPP exonerating the dera head. There was thus open resentment by the Sikhs against such a hukamnama.
Hukamnama issued against establishment of
a new Gurdwara. Here the Jathedars falsely
claim that the issue has been debated upon.
This is one example how unjustified firman were
got issued through PPP the political Panj
piaras.
Giving fuel to the fire, at various places the Sikh holy book Guru Granth sahib was got desecrated in phased and planned manner. It was got done in such a manner that gave the impression that the Dera was behind this. Police could nab some men who did this crime but refused to go to the root of it. The senior officers like the SSPs would themselves intervene in the cases and stop further investigation.
The Sikh nation thus protested at the hukamnama issued by PPP and the wide spread resentment pricked the conscience of the real Panj Pyaras of Akal Takhat (RPP). They issued a hukamnama on Oct. 20, 2015 asking the SGPC to relieve PPP who had issued a firman in favour of Sirsa Dera Head. It is suspected may be some vested interests persuaded the otherwise dormant RPP to act to create confusion.
The SGPC thus suspended them because it was a challenge to the PPP who were used by SGPC many a times before. Also it was well known that the PPP would issue hukamnama on the orders from political bosses. Thus the political boss will try to defend them to any extent. Due to protests by Sikh masses the SGPC reinstated the RPP.
But again the RPP issued a hukamnama asking the authorities to relieve the PPP members by Dec. 31. 2015 or else RPP would issue further directive. The SGPC immediately dismissed the services of RPP members.
SGPC head Avtar Singh Makkarh and Sukhbir Badal issued statements that SGPC head is qualified to sack the RPP. Sukhbir even issued a statement that Piaras like RPP are there in every street gurdwara whose power is only to administer pahul 'Amrit Chhakauna'. We therefore humbly say that the Panj Piaras from the axis of Sikhism are different from village/street Panj Piaras. Also those engaged in administration of Pahul, who recite gurbani before any verdict are the real panch pardhan as compared to PPP who would issue hukamnamas at the instance of politicians. Thus SGPC has no power or right to sack RPP under such circumstances. Besides the present body of SGPC is a care taker one and not elected one. It absolutely has no right to interfere in such issues which pertain to interpretation of basic Sikh tenets. We also wish to convey that even the gali/mohalla/village Panj Piaras are no less important if they act accordance to Gurbani and wishes of sangat engaged in naam.


Please leave your comment below.


  
Continue Reading | comments

MARTYR THE MOST MISUNDERSTOOD WORD

Tuesday, 6 May 2014



 MARTYR THE MOST MISUNDERSTOOD WORD

Shaheed or the martyr is the most misunderstood word today. Any body even a riff raff killed in ambush is termed as martyr by his party. This is a gross insult to the sacred ‘term’ which means ‘witness’. The first and foremost condition of martyrdom is that the person has option to live i.e to do this or be ready for death. If the person volunarily opts death he is martyr in the real sense of word. So when a person lays down his life to prove his conviction or witness his conviction he is called a martyr when no one else is there to support his idea.
Shahadat is a Persian word which means witness. This word is very much prevalent in Indian judicial parlance. If some one has to give his statement of witness in the court the advocate will advise the concerned, "well Mr. such and such tomarrow is your shahadat in the court, come prepared". So a real martyr has to give witness with reference to his conviction. When no other person is ready to stand witness to the legitimacy of somebody's stand the martyre himself appears as a witness. To prove seriousness of his conviction  he prefers to lay down his life. So in case of martyrdom there should be a clear choice to live. In any case where there is no option to lay the death can't qualify as martyrdom
A soldier caught in ambush or cross fire, or killing of Indira Gandhi, Benazir Butto, Beant Singh etc. in ambushes can’t qualify to the term ‘martyr’ because in such cases the option to live is missing.
Incidentally Sikhism has produced many martyrs. Martyrdom of Banda Bahadur is exemplary while the youngest martyr of the world also happens to be from Sikhism: Sahibzada Fateh Singh the youngest son of Guru Gobind Singh who was bricked alive at the age of less than 7 years.
Continue Reading | comments

VADH BACHEY

What's New?

Issue 8

Issue xix

 

Punjab Monitor