WAVELL’S STUPID SIKHS
Poor Sikh Leaders at Partition i.e 1947
1947 SAW THE LARGEST EVER MIGRATION OF HUMAN HISTORY |
(OCR (machine) typing E&OE)
NEHRU After independence when Nehru's attention was drawn to promises Congress had made To Srkhs he politely said, "Now the rcumstances are changed. " |
Without any qualm it can be accepted that the Sikhs are one
of the most enterprising and mobile nations with myriad qualities. They have
excelled in the realms of agriculture, army, education, medicine, engineering,
business and industry. B.S.Goraya in an in-depth study of the partition process
has focused on leaders who were at the helm of Sikh affairs at that crucial
turn in history. The writer has tangible evidence to corroborate blatant
naivety of the Sikh leaders and dissembles political handling of grim issues by
them using very harsh but justified adjectives.
1947 was the year when vultures had devoured with great
relish a rare meal, the human flesh. Bearing brawny human bones in their lusty
jaws, dogs roamed freely in the land of five rivers. Punjabi blood deluged the gutters
of Lahore and Amritsar. This year of madness witnessed the largest ever
migration in human history. The magnitude of the massacre and its brutality can
be judged from the fact that the modesty of over 2 lac Punjabi women was
defiled.
We have' enjoyed the fruits of freedom for half a century
now. On their part the Sikhs have excessively paid the price for 'freedom'. The
Sikhs lost nearly 2 lacs community members and were deprived of their large estates,
farms, spacious havelis and even. hearths. And yet after independence they were
lost in the noisy slogans of 'Punjabi-Suba Zindabad'. The world at large failed
to grasp what the Sikhs were doing.
A close " study of activities of the Sikh politics i from
1940 to 1947 exposes the self contradictory approach of the Sikh leaders who
lacked political skill, statesmanship and diplomacy.
None of the accepted Sikh leader was a politician in the real sense of the
word. Master Tara Singh, who ruled over the Sikh mind from 1925 to his death in
1967 had later confessed that he was not a politician but a religious leader.lt
is a hard fact that he was no match for Mahatma Gandhi, Jinnah, Nehru and Patel.
Due to their undiplomatic and tactless moves the Sikh leaders
made enemies every where. They made the National Congress suspicious of them as
time and again they branded it a fanatic Hindu party. At times they excelled
even Jinnah and other Muslim leaguers in their criticism of the Congress. While
at the same time the Akalis pledged an un-qualified dedication to its policies
and programmes. The Akalis once went to the extent of saying that the Congress
was like the eleventh Guru for them.
The Akali antagonism towards Muslims and British is too well
known which hardly need any elaboration.
By the commencement of World War II, it had become clear
that the Indian independence was in the offing and only a formal date was to be
announced. It is a well known fact that the British in the latter years of
their rule had demonstrated their mellifluous and benevolent attitude towards
the Sikhs keeping in view the Sikh role in the British war effort. On various occasions
the English leaders and Officers viz, Cripps, Moon, Short etc. had advised the
Sikh leaders to initiate dialogues between the Congress as well as League,
secure maximum leverage in the bargain and finally align with the party which
promised them of maximum, minority provisions. The Sikhs however ignored the
advice. In fact, The Sikh leader at the centre Baldev Singh, spitted on the
British hint of a Sikh state. While at the same time they offered Sikh, youth for recruitment in
the military during war.
Many a resolution in favour of a Sikh state (Khalistan) were
passed and surprisingly in this effort even Congressite Sikhs were associated.
In fact, these moves by the Sikhs were to neutralise the Muslim demand for Pakistan.
Nevertheless they failed to convince or take into confidence the Punjabi Hindus
and the Congress.
ln the pre Partition era the Sikh political parties or
groups of some prominence were (a) Khalsa National Party, the political wing of Chief Khalsa Dewan,
founded by Sir Sunder Singh Majithia. It virtually vanished with the death of
Majithia in 1941, (b) The pro Congress Central Akali Dal of Baba Kharag Singh
(1867-1963), (c) The Sikhs in the Congress like Partap Singh Kairon, Swarn
Singh etc. (d) Communists like Teja Singh Swatantar and Sohan singh Josh, and
(e) the most important party of the Sikhs the Shromani Akali Dal led by Master
Tara Singh. lts other important leaders were Giani Kartar Singh, Baldev Singh,
lshar Singh Majhail, Udham Singh Nagoke etc.
Master Tara Singh who
dominated the Sikh politics at that time, fully understood the pulse, of the
Akali leaders and workers and was their best manager.
Muslim League passed
the Pakistan resolution in Lahore on March
23,'1940 which meant that the whole of undivided Punjab was to be a part of Pakistan. Had Pakistan been finally
formed in accordance with the Lahore Resolution, the Muslims would have enjoyed
a slender majority only (i.e 53%, Hindus 30% and the Sikhs 14%) as far as the
Punjab was concerned.
While the Congress initially did not take the resolution
seriously the Sikhs were 'shocked' by it. Master said that the resolution meant
'striking of a civil war' and "to realise it the Muslims will have to
cross an ocean of Sikh blood" etc.
It appears that the Sikhs did not give a serious thought to
such developments and their outcries were more emotional in nature than any strategic
diplomatic move. Master accused Congress of having bowed before the Muslim
obstinacy (zid) He further declared that in matters relating to Pakistan and
other communal issues the Sikhs would henceforth decide for themselves.
The Congressite Sikhs dubbed the Akalis approach as communal
and anti-national. They felt Akali's strong opposition to communal award and Pakistan
was ridiculous, The Akalis reacted sharply to the Congress reaction and
cautioned the Sikhs not to rely on any one's sword but to improve their own
strength so that no one i.e. Congress can betray them later.
The Congress further insisted that the 'Pakistan' whatever
it may mean, could not be worse than the
foreign domination and the Pakistan was the 'price of freedom' they will
perhaps have to pay.
Add caption |
On March 22 1942 Cripps Mission arrived in India. The Sikh delegation
comprising of Baldev Singh, Master Tara Singh, Joginder Singh, Ujjal Singh and
Mohan Singh met Cripps and demanded preservation of Indian unity and integrity.
They also demanded creation of a new province called 'Azad Puniab' comprising
of Jalandhar and Ambala divisions plus three districts of Lahore, Gurdaspur and
Amritsar by taking out Muslim majority Divisions. Azad Punjab they said would
have 63% Non-muslims and 37% Muslims. While the remaining part of the Punjab would
have 77% Muslims and 23% Non-muslims. The demand was later ridiculed by the
Hindus and other Sikh parties. The Hindus alleged that it was a demand tor
Khalistan under the misleading name of 'Azad Punjab'.
The fantastic feature of the proposed 'Azad Punjab' was that
it bisected the Sikh community into 2 parts. The Azad Punjab area covered 61% of
the Sikh population while the 39% were to be left in the West Punjab at the mercy
of the Muslims. It is ridiculous that the Azad Punjab demand included areas
with scant Sikh .population like Gurgaon (O.O7% Sikhs), Rohtak (0.15%), Karnal
(2%), Kangra (0.53%) while it excluded Shekhupura with '18.8%, Lyalpur
(18:82%), Syalkot (11 .71%), Gujranwala (10.87%) and Rawaipindi having (8.17%),
Sikhs.
The Akalis thus themselves sowed the seed of vivisection of
their own community. Surprisingly, Azad Punjab was the idea of Giani Kartar. Singh
who was known as the 'Brain of the Sikhs', and was second in,' command ,in Akali
Dal and after independence defected to Congress. According to some sources the
'Azad Punjab' scheme was conceived by S. Ujjal Singh the Ex-governor.
LEADERS AT THE FAMOUS SIMLA CONFERECNE JINNAH, KRIPLANI, LIAQUAT, MAULANA. |
The Akalis agitated for Azad Punjab for about 2-3 years and
latter abandoned the demand. Though Master wrote a book on Azad Puniab, challenging
its opponents and Hindus to prove how the demand went against them.
Master who was highly
biased against the Mohammedans, was not prepared for a dialogue with, them and gave
false statements after the Partition was
over causing much loss to mankind. At one point, he blamed Hindus,
"Punjabi Hindus turned down a good proposal of Jinnah. About 25% of
Punjabi Hindu and some Sikh leaders were in Birla House while Jinnah was at his Aurangzeb Road
bungalow, Delhi. Raja Maheshwar Dyal met us and would take our messages to Jinnah.
Through these messages we reached at an accord with Jinnah.
The understanding arrived at was that the areas with more than 65% Muslim population
would form a Part of Pakistan. According to this proposal, our boundary would
have gone beyond river Ravi, though it did not reach Chenab. We were to get
Lahore, Syalkot, Gujranwala, most Part of Shekhupura and some parts of Lyallpur
and Montgomery too.'
Vlhy should they stand belore a Ferangi- Baldev,
Master,Jogendra and other wfuh Cripps.
Sir Stafford Cripps, Pathic Lawrence,
A. V Alexander with Viceroy Lord Wavell Sir Goerge Abell behind Wavell. |
"After it was verbally agreed, it was then decided to
reduce it into writing. Thereafter Ganesh Datt along with another gentleman
joined us and turned down the proposal immediately. It was lost not because of
Jinnah but because of our own side.'
As a matter of fact Master was merely shifting the blame as
he himself was not prepared for a dialogue with Muslim leaders and had lost
several opportunities. On one occasion in 1947, Master was persuaded by Sikh Student
Federation to have talk with Jinnah at 11 am in some bungalow in Lahore. Master
however reached at 10 am and before the arrival of Jinnah he left the bungalow
through a back door.
Harcharan Singh Bajwa, an Akali who later defected to
Congress after ‘freedom’ claimed that it was he who persuaded Master not to
have talks with Jinnah and as such he helped to avert the formation of
Khalistan. Late Kapoor Singh the sacked l.C.S. officer narrates one more
incidence of a meeting of Sikh leaders at Lahore where a letter listing the
conditions for Khalistan within Pakistan was drafted lor consideration by Jinnah.
The Sikh leaders decided that such an important letter should not be sent by
Post and rather some responsible person should go to Delhi to deliver the
letter. Choice fell on Dr. Gopal Singh, who instead of taking the letter to
Jinnah went straight away to Nehru and handed over that letter to him. Nehru,
in the sixties once hinted about that letter alleging that Master had been
hobnobbing with the League before the dawn of independence. It is possible that
as a reward for the patriotism shown by late Gopal Singh he was all his life
kept comfortable by way of assignments as (1) nomination for Rajya Sabha (b)
Ambassador (3) Member Minority Commission (4) Chairman Minority Commission
(5)Governor etc.
ln his ailicle in the
Indian Express of Nov. 12, 1981 , H.S. Mallick (lCS), the Ex-Prime minister of Patiala
estate recalled how a meeting of Maharaja Patiala, Master and Giani Kartar
Singh with Jinnah was held at the residence of his brother Teja Singh in New
Delhi. He recalled how Jinnah was more than generous and agreed to our
virtually impossible conditions. There after
Mallick writes : "l went and saw Mr. U.M. Sen and said, "My
dear friend, I have never asked you to do anything for me. But today I have a
request to make, a very important request. I then told him about the meeting
with Jinnah. The next day, the Statesman carried the headline in bold letter '
THE SIKHS WILL UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES ACCEPT PAKISTAN'. That was our answer to
Jinnah. We could have Khalistan if we wanted as that was what Jinnah really
hinted at, because he new fully well that we could never agree to live in
Pakistan. That was the price he was offering us to agree to the formation of
Pakistan.
Mallick says that 'We issued the press statement to avoid
any false propaganda that might be created to give a false colour to Sikh
leaders."
Akali Dal as we have
seen was a very confused lot. The Pak demand had caught momentum. ToP Akali
leaders were in the grip of Baldev Singh -the son of an industrialist and was
regularly remitting, some sort of remunerations to the Sikh leaders. He also
gave liberal donations to Akali Dal. In turn Baldev Singh was in the grip of
Congress leaders like Patel and Nehru. As such indirectly the Congress
controlled Akali Dal through Baldev. Top Akali leaders were put to embarrassment
when ever they had to pass any resolutions against the Congress under the
pressure of their own cadres. This was the reason why several resolutions
passed under the pressure of masses were not later persuaded or implemented.
Master, too in those days said that the Sikhs do not
identify with the Congress though in so far as the Congress favoured India's
freedom they were in sympathy with it.
An all party Sikh
conference was held in Amritsar in Aug. 1944 which passed a resolution for the
establishment of Khalistan and authorised Master to appoint a committee to go
into its detailed implications.
Master did not deliberately pursue the minutes of this all
party conference and the committee issue was consigned to some cold storage. (This is a clear cut examples of Master’s betrayal
of Sikh aspirations.) The Akali workers and leaders had perhaps no courage or
mind to question Master-for his willful non-compliance. In the same Amritsar
Conference Master declared that the Sikhs were a nation and should not be made
slaves of Pakistan or Hindustan. Giani also
gave a very hard speech and said that no appeal should be made to the Sikhs
in the name of India.
The Shromani
Gurudwara Prabandak Committee on March 9,
1946 passed a resolution for Khalistan urging the Sikh masses to strive
and agitate for its accomplishment. It said that the Sikhs are fully qualified
as a nation. 'It regretted that a certain disinformation campaign has been
launched declaring the Sikhs as a branch of the tree called Hindgism. Interestingly
even Partap Singh Kairon was also a member of SGPC when this resolution was
passed.
The Akalis also submitted a memorandum to the Sapru
Committee demanding creation of Khalistan if the Pakistan was to be conceded.
Signatories to this demand included Master, Giani, Swarn Singh, Prince Jodh
Singh, Ujjal Singh and lshar Singh Majhail.
Add caption |
The above goal was
later officially adopted through a resolution on March 22, 1946 by the
Executive Committee of the Akali Dal which stated, "The entity of the
Sikhs is being threatened on account of the persistent demand of Pakistan on
the one hand and of the danger of absorption by the Hindus on the other, the
committee demands for the preservation and protection of the religious,
cultural, and economic and political rights of the Sikh nation, the creation of
a Sikh state which would include a substantial majority -of the Sikh population
and their sacred shrines and historical gurudwaras with provision for the transfer and exchange of
population and property".
Speaking from Sikh
platforms, Master criticised Muslims and Hindus alike. He frequently said,
"Association with Muslims was like contracting Cholera disease where the death is quick while
with Hindus its T.B, where the death is relatively slow' (History shows, he
preferred Cyanide of partition instead, massacring about 2 lack Sikhs instantly
plus contracting of T.B. as he claimed).
Master did not trust anyone and would say how could Sikhs have anything common
with the Muslims who killed four sons of the Guru. About Hindus, he would say they
are bent upon absorbing the Sikhs.
Kapoor Singh, once
told him that inspite of the killing of his family, Guru Gobind Singh was ready
for a dialogue with Aurangzeb while Master was evading it. He said, it is with
Muslims that the Sikhism flourishes because whenever there is a collision
between Islam and Hinduism, Sikhism gains.
ln the light of the
above developments in April 1946, Nehru accused Master of "sitting at one
and the same time, on 15 stools". Master retorted that he did not need a
permit from Nehru to see Jinnah or anybody else and that he intended to secure
independent position for the Sikhs.
According to Durlabh Singh, thereafter processions of Sikh
and Muslim students were organised raising slogans for Pakistan and Khalistan
but "death to Congress".
Congress leaders were condemned from the Gurudwara platforms.
Similar ups and downs had been going on in the Akalis
relations with the Congress. In 1940, Mahatma Gandhi wrote to Master' You have
nothing in common with the Congreess. You believe in the rule of sword, the
Congress does not.'
Earlier the same
Master had pledged for the unity of India when he attended the Akhand Hindustan
Conference at Ludhiana on Nov. 2, '1941. Similar Hindu and Sikhs conferences
organised by Hindu Mahasabha were held in Lahore and Amritsar. H.S. Dilgir (now
a pro-India writer) believes such conferences were aimed to keep the Sikhs away
from the idea of the Khalistan and support to Pakistan.
The Akalis were busy
in passing resolutions after resolutions. Sometimes for Azad Punjab, Sikh
State, Sikhistan, Unity and Integrity of India and condemning Pakistan etc.
Such resolutions were passed atleast on June 7 1949, Aug. 15 1943, Jan.23 1944,
March '18 1944, April 23 1944, Aug.6
1944 and Aug. 20 1944. On every occasion they would Pass a fresh resolution in
favour of Sikh state in complete disregard of the earlier ones. More often than
not their resolutions were contradictory. Central Akali Dal (CAD) of Baba
Kharag Slngh was also quite active. The CAD though pursued independent policy
but was more inclined to Congress than the Akali Dal. They took a concealed
stand and vehemently opposed the Azad Punjab demand in which they envisaged the
division of the Sikhs.
An All Party Sikh
conference was held on Sept. 24, 1944 which voiced their deep concern over the
possible formation of Muslim Govt in Lahore. The following day Gandhi- Jinnah
talks were held at the residence of Gandhi and the Sikhs courted arrest against
such talks. The bankrupcy of their wit again demonstrated.
In the Oct. 14, 1944
Lahore Conference of Akali Dal the main slogan was "Beware of Russian
Agents" Master said in his speech that the Sikhs were facing danger f rom
(1) Communists (2) The English' (3) Gandhi (4) Jinnah. Interestingly the
Communists in those days supported the Pakistan demand and advocated Khalistan.
Booklets in support of Khalistan were also published by the Communists like G. Adhikari.
In complete disregard of allt he resolutions that his party had passed, Master
warned the concerned parties, "We have not yet finally decided for
Khalistan and as such our doors are still open for discussions.
On Nov. 24, 1944
Jinnah said in Delhi, "Pakistan is now a reality and no power of the world
can stop it. Advising the Sikhs he said, 'Why don't you demand Khalistan
instead of opposing Pakistan.'
Surely Pakistan had by then become a mass movement. The
Hindu press gave it maximum publicity. The British Govt did little to
discourage it, rather they advertently promoted it as they lost little in its
realisation. The Congress had already acquiesced to it through the famous
Rajaji Formula. Despite all this the Sikhs had not awakened to the situation.
ThE Akali Conference of Jan. 8, 1945 resolved that the Sikhs
had always been with the Congress and will ever remain with it. Exactly in
these days only the Congress issued a whP to, its Sikh member Mangal Singh that
he will not ask any question pertaining to the Sikhs in the Central Assembly.
No doubt committed to the Sikh cause Master was not prepared
for any settlement over which the Hindus had even a slight hitch. The Student
Federation people would therefore call him'the Hindu Putra'.
On July 15, 1945, he
said, "l will oppose the Pakistan even if ,l have to face civil war. If
Jinnah wants Pakistan he will have to concede Khalistan in the Punjab.
"H.S. Dilgir (the self styled national professor ol Sikhism) complains
that Master did not demand Khalistan and was bent upon pleasing the Congress
Hindus. Says Dilgir, "The army of the lions was lead by donkeys as their
generals.'
On Augusl 24, 1945 Sardar Patel reiterated the Congress
pledge of 1929 that the free India will not accept any such constitution which.
is not acceptable to the Sikhs.
ln a Sikh conference
of Oct, 2, 1944 the cry over Khalistan was once again raised as, "Gandhi
was bent upon betraying the Sikhs". Speaking at Peshawar on Jan 2, 1944, Master said, "We want independence and honourable existence; The
Hindus are determined I to keep both Sikhs and Muslims under I their thumb and
to keep the Sikhs in t confusion. "Dr. Gurmit Singh a noted Sikh historian
has remarked that in spite of all these statements which contradicted his
actions, Master faithfully toed the Congress approach. Master though at times
would announce at Sikh meetings that there is going to be Hindu Raj after the
British .Raj yet he did little to secure the Sikh position. He preferred Hindu
Raj to British Raj but said that under no circumstances could he tolerate the
'Muslim Raj' whatever amount of minority protection clauses they promised. He
was favourably disposed towards Hindus till his first arrest in free India at Narela in 1948.
C. Rajagopalachari
revealed in 1964 that he had duly cautioned Master in the year 1946 that they
(Sikhs) would not get anything at the hands of the Congress after the
independence was achieved and whatever the Sikh objectives they should get
through negotiations with the League and the British. As noted earlier similar advice from the English leader like Cripps,
Moon, Short, Wavell etc. had been ignored by them.
Later in the
elections of winter of 1945-46 the Muslim League came out to be the largest
party with 74 seats out of l75 while the Congress secured 51 , Akalis 23 and
the Unionist Party the ruling party was marginalised with only 21 seats while
in the outgoing Assembly their strength was 90. Ignoring the verdict and the
wishes of masses the Akalis and, Congress preferred an unholy alliance with the
Unionist Party and supported it to form
the Govt at Lahore. The situation was identical with the present day
forming of Govt by Janta Dal with ine support of parties with different hues
and colours while BJP the majority party has been prevented from forming the
Govt. The League took the issue to streets warning the Muslim masses how their verdict was not being honoured by
the Hindus and the Sikhs. The Muslim mind felt agitated, aggrieved and
discriminated against. And the spate of murders what the world later witnessed
was the result of hatred generated by the League workers and leaders.
The Leaguers later
got a tremendous pressure mounted on the Unionist people that the Premier Mr.
Khijar Hyat Tiwana had to resign despite the
committed support from Congress and the Akalis to his Govt. It is said
it was Tiwana's mother who persuaded him to resign as where ever she went, she
found people hurling abuses on the Unionist leaders, branding them as traitors.
At the fall of the
Unionist Govt. the League was next to be invited by the Governor to form
government at Lahore. On the evening ol
March 3, 1947 itself the Sikhs and Hindus gathered in a large number. In this
conference Master was accepted as their common leader. Provocative speeches were
delivered. A sword as usual in his hand, Master thundered:-
"Aye Sikhs and Hindus get ready for sacrifices. Our motherland demands
blood. Get ready for it. Bravo if we can get independence from the English what
worth are these 'Muslims ? The Muslims had snatched rule from the Hindus which
the Sikhs snatched in turn. Now again we will rule. I hereby sound the bugle
(of war) Finish the Muslim League;'
Next day, a joint procession of Hindus and Sikh students was
taken out in Lahore and on the same day a - Hindu-Sikh conference was held at
Amritsar. Provocative speeches of the Sikh leaders ignited the spark of senseless
murders everywhere. Muslim murderous thugs moved with biggest drama.
Sir Evan Jenkins, the Governor of Punjab took a notice of
the prevailing law and order situation and refused to invite Muslim League
party to form the Govt. Master came out a victorious man while the losers were
the Punjabi masses who became thirsty for each others blood.
Analysts believe, it was the biggest blunder by Master. Had
the league formed govt. they would l nave
then taken the responsibility to maintain law and order rather than disrupt it
as they really did. If the league was in Power, the Muslim sympathy with them would have eroded
to some extent and the Punjab would not have seen the massacre it did.
The British were
attempting through all possible feelers
to persuade Sikh leaders to demand Khalistan. A graphic account of such moves
is given by Kapoor Singh. One such hint
came through Shivdev Singh Oberai,
member of the Privy Council who sent his son from London to Punjab to convey to
the Sikh leaders.
A similar feeler was
sent through Sir Jogendra Singh the member of Central Assembly during the days
of arrival of Cabinet Mission. Jogendra invited Akali leaders to Delhi who in
turn scolded Jogendra. Maharaja Bhupinder Singh of Patiala who was to
participate in the 2nd Round Table
Conference, confided with some Sikhs that if he was authorised, he could
talk to the Britishers on behalf of the Sikhs and would surely return with
something big for the Sikhs.
Stung by the snake of jealousy, Master the Akali leader
refused to authorise the Maharaja to talk on behalf of the Sikhs and as such
one more opportunity was lost. The British had not deliberately invited Master
to London.
On a similar important occassion, when Dr. B. R. Ambedkar
was almost prepared to embrace Sikhism along with his 6 crore Dalit followers
he was prevented by Master's men. Several analysts and people close to Master concluded
that the Master did it because had Ambedkar joined Sikhism, there was a danger
to Master's leadership.
After independence with the change of masters the leaders
changed their colours. Every leader was trying to project himself as the
saviour of Indian integrity. In this category fell Swarn Singh, Gopal Singh
Dardi, Giani Kartar Singh, Kairon and Nagoke. Master who had by then attained
the dubious role by his contradictory stands claims "IT WAS HE WHO PREVENTED
ESTABLISHMENT OF KHALISTAN OR ELSE IT WOULD HAVE BEEN A REALITY' Besides he
admitted in his autobiography that some British officers were hell bent to
hammer out some compromise between the Sikhs and the Muslims for establishment
of Khalistan within Pakistan, which he thwarted.
' After the death of Sardar Patel, Nehru dropped Baldev
Singh from the Defence portfolio of his Cabinet. Baldev fell sick and after
some days he issued a press statement "The Hindus have betrayed me",
He confessed before other Sikh leaders that he deserved the torture on bed he
was undergoing. "On three occassions", confessed Baldev, "l have
prevented the independence of the Sikhs and formation ol Sikh state, I have
thrown the Sikhs chained before the cruel Hindus- God forgive me".
Reacting to the
Baldev's accusations Kairon the then CM reacted, "lt ls a sick statement
from a sick man". Such confessions from Baldev raised many a Sikh eyebrow
to speculate as to what were those three secret occassions. At least one missing
link has since been discovered.
Jinnah, Nehru and Baldev were invited for discussions to London in Dec.
1946 to 'remove the prevailing deadlock. After the talks were over and the
leaders were to return to India, Baldev was secretly asked by British to stay on
so that something for the Sikhs was also done. Baldev passed on this secret
message to Nehru.
Nehru a born statesmen did not leave UK until he ensured
that Baldev was ahead of him in embarking the plane for Delhi. While leaving
London Baldev spoke to press:- "The Sikhs have no separate demand from the
English. We will settle with Congress. We only want that the British leave India."
This statement was a surprise for everyone as it was a
bygone conclusion that the British were leaving India as soon as possible. It
ls alleged that the statement Baldev made before the press was prepared by
Nehru himself.
Kapoor Singh says, he
has been able to know as to what was the British proposal which they were to
make to Baldev. He writes, "If the Sikhs are not prepared for any
agreement with the Muslims, the English were ready to concede the area from
Nankana Sahib ,to Panipat and the British would also see to its security for 10
years. In turn the Khalistan Govt. would have to depute 25000 Sikh soldiers for
the British colonies. After 10 years, the agreement with the Sikhs will be
reviewed. The British were ready to give Khalistan, a passage upto Arabian Sea
and in this way, Khalistan would have served as a buffer state between Pakistan
and Hindustan and insured peace in the regionl
Kapoor Singh admits
that a similar feeler was given to him in Feb. 1947 when he was working at
Lahore Secretariat and that he passed it to the Sikh leaders but MasterTara
Singh and Giani Kartar Singh laughed at it.
Kapoor narrated yet
another incidence when Cabinet Mission was in Delhi and the Sikhs had gone to
meet it. Sir Cripps asked Baldev, "Sardar Sahib, what to do for the Sikhs.
The English are deeply inclined to do something for them.'
Baldev Singh,."lf Pakistan is to be conceded, Khalistan
be also formed". (Even by that time he had not realized what a reality
Pakistan had been). Sir Pethic Lawrence, "Thers is no objection to it but
where to form it. See the map is hanging before you, demarcate the area where
you want it'
Baldev Singh - (Silence).
Sir Cripps then took the pointer stick in his hands and moved
it in a circular way from Panipat to Nankana Sahib. '
Baldev Singh - "No... No..., my nation aspires for a
rule upto Jehlum. We wlll not accept this small area."
Referring to this episode Dr. Kirpal Slngh, an authority on
the Partition history who had earlier justified the stand ol Akalis writes in his
recent book that it was the best offer the Sikhs could get.
Kapoor Singh recalls
an incldent when Rafa Gazanlar Ali once asked him, what do the Slkhs think ? Witty
they are indifferent to the possible losses and gains and have merely become
puppets ln the hands of Hindus and are bent upon to take bath in the blood of
their Muslim neighbours ?', Kapoor Singh says that the history will ever demand
an explanation from these leaders.
Sir Fazl-e-Hussian
the ex- Premier of Punjab wrote in the year of 1925 in a book which was for private
circulation but somehow fell in the hands of a Sikh:-
"Hindus consider political matters and their
implications years ahead. The Musalman tries to tackle them just in time. But
the Sikhs never think of them unless the time is actually passed and the matter
well settled."
Jinnah once remarked, lt is difficult to understand the
position of the Sikhs by logic or justice - Ah, the Sikh leadership' When
Kapoor Singh protested at these remarks of Jinnah, he said, "youngman,
sentiments and emotions are not the same thing as political insight. Consider
my remarks dispassionately and if you can do something, do it. When you grow
mature, you will mark my words. ' Cautioning the Sikhs on some other occassion,
Jinnah said, "sardar Sahib, you have seen Hindus as your co- slaves. You
are yet to see them as your rulers."
Meher Chand Mahajan
the former Chief Justice of India wrote in his 'Stern Reckoning" 'The
Maharaj of Patiala as an Indian patriot scornfully rejected Jinnah's offer of
Sikh State at the sacrifice of his own state throne and power." About the
same Maharaja of Patiala Sir Yadvendra Singh Lord Wavell the Viceroy of India
recorded. I could only say that the Sikhs if they play their cards well, could
exercise an influence in Punjab far beyond their numbers. But they do not
usually play well.'
Lord Attlee the then PM of UK also opined in his book
"As it Happened " that the Sikhs were led by incapable men and as
such could not get any thing for their nation. Campbell Johnson in his
"Mission With Mountbatten" writes the Sikh leaders could not explain
what they wanted and were only crying that the pakistan be not formed. Leonard
Mosley writes in his "Last Days Of British Raj" that here in Delhi the
wind pipe of the Sikh body was being slit and the Sikhs were busy twisting
their moustaches and waving their swords in air." Penderell Moon in his
'Divide and Quit' wrote that the Sikh leaders were bent upon crossing the
limits of stupidity and when ever some matter was revealed to them they would
pay no attention.
Wavell writes, "he talked about to a group the Sikhs
States to do something of the problem of
the Sikhs generally but nothing came out of it ' ln the end, Wavell wrote that
Maharaja Patiala was a stupid.
ln the 2nd week of July 1947, Giani Kartar Singh met Sir
Evan Jenkins, Governor of Punjab, by that time the 'wisdom' of the Sikh
leaders had started bearing fruits;
migration of people had commenced and killings started. Giani burst into tears
before the Governor and asked Jenkins to do something to save the Sikhs.
Jenkins later wrote "at the same time, I thought that the Sikhs had only
themselves to blame for their present position. The Giani himself had insisted
on partition and Baldev Singh had accepted the plan.'
The fact is, Akalis
have never thought that there would be such a massacre and wide scale
migration, They never asked for a state with the area proportionate to the Sikh
population. They had always nurtured a guilt that the Sikhs did not enjoy
absolute majority in any district.
Migrations and massacres could not make the Master realise
his follies and he woke up only when he was arrested in 1948 at Narela in the
free India. A tough leader who would not confess and would rather change
his stand quite often. Once Khushwat Singh,
the renowned journalist, asked, him, why the Master gave a new agitation
programme tb the Sikh, every now and then. Master replied that he wants to
really keep his people engaged, so that they do not create some big problems.
However, where the devil of death was near his cot, his conscious pricked him
and he wrote,
"Oh my Tenth
Lord Dashmesh I have not been able to fulfill the pledge, I took at the
baptismal ceremony. At death, repenting I am at your door. Oh lord, forgive me
and help the Sikhs in this event of crises.
Referring to the Punjab politics Lord Wavell wrote in his
memoirs, “The trouble in getting any settlement is that both the Congress and
Muslim League are controlled from outside, from Delhi and Bombay; while the
Sikhs who are in a position to negotiate on the ,spot are disunited and poorly
led; Master Tara Singh is stupid and emotional.
------------
Please also see the video on this subject
Also read article in Punjabi
------------
Please also see the video on this subject
Also read article in Punjabi
4 comments:
Oh my Tenth Lord Dashmesh I have not been able to fulfill the pledge, I took at the baptismal ceremony. At death, repenting I am at your door. Oh lord, forgive me and help the Sikhs in this event of crises. Referring to the Punjab politics Lord Wavell wrote in his memoirs.
Do you believe this? What a shame?
Thanks to share such a article.
listen on youtube ,"Akali leader Tara Singh had refused Khalistan"
Tara Singh was two mouth snake , one mouth for Hindus and other mouth for Sikhs . He had planned to KILL JINNAH and innocent Muslims ! Read Lord Mountbatten's TOP SECRET report of August 9,1947 given at page 172 of book MOUNTBATTEN AND THE PARTITION OF INDIA . This plan had triggered off killing and ousting of Sikhs from West Punjab !
Post a Comment