MASSANIA AGAIN

Monday, 8 February 2016

MASSANIA AGAIN
Massania a historical village near Batala is a place of pilgrimage for my friends across the border. On their request I had visited this village 4-5 years ago. Today I happen to go to village and I could not stop my self paying obeisance at the  holy place. I upload the photos I clicked with the hope my dear friend Abbas Sadiq Massanavi will provide the necessary history and captions.
It is Dargah of Hazret Shah Badar Diwan a pious peer of Muslims. On Aug 18th 1498 A.D Hazret came to Batala. From the name it appears that it was a cremation ground before the Hazret arrived. Shamshan is a Sanskrit word which means cremation ground and in Punjabi we simply call it massan. Massania is a plural of massan. It is also likely that the name of place was different when the Hazret stayed here and became Massania because there being many graves. Any way it is a pious village.

please click to enlarge the image














































Continue Reading | comments (2)

WOMAN IN HINDUISM

Sunday, 7 February 2016

WOMAN IN HINDUISM
For those who say we worship woman as devi the goddess

For Sikhs we recently posted an update on Facebook quoting Guru Nanak where the Guru says that how can you condemn the woman who gave births to kings (and prophets and avatars.)
SHE GAVE BIRTH TO YOUR PROPHETS AND AVATARS, HOW CAN YOU CONDEMN WOMAN

We also quoted Tulsi Ramayana where the Acharya writes that a beast, a pet a shudra and the woman deserve to be reprimanded. At this some of our Hindu friends protested and said that the statement was an isolated case and that woman are fairly treated in Hinduism. "On the contrary they said "woman is worshipped in Hindu society as a devi the goddess". We request such friends to please see this article to see pitiable condition of woman and thus shed prejudice. It is our bias of Indian society which in fact is responsible for highest number of rapes in India. Thus we believe that actually it is these adamant people who are responsible for injustices to woman.
 (please click to enlarge this photo)


Baroda Gujrat Devdasis photographed a century ago

On the contrary we believe that Hindu scriptures have promoted rape. We believe this could be the reason for high incidence of rape in Indian society. While we admit that certain mythological women characters are worshipped but over all the condition of woman in Hindu society is far from being equal to man. We believe such writings as the following send a positive message among the masses and bring awareness of the modern values for creating humanitarian society. Look here where woman stands in Hindu society and think twice to blame others;-

Last surviving Devdasi of Jagan Nath puri

• Hindu scriptures treat women as a commodity, and equates them to animals.

• In Hinduism only the wife has to fast during Karvachauth but not the husband. 

• The wife has to wear Mangulsutra and apply Sindoor to signify that ‘She is the property of others’ just like a board is set up in an open land stating it’s owner but the husband has no such thing to wear. 

• If the girl is born in inauspicious months then she is termed as Manglik, and per this superstition the husband of such girl dies soon so she is made to marry a peepul tree or a dog but on the other hand there is no such thing for a man. 

• As per Hindu scripture the wife either has to lead a life of celibacy after the death of her husband or mount husband’s pyre on the other hand there is no such rule for husbands. The husband is free to marry another wife after the death of his wife and can marry many wives even when the wife is alive. 

• Only the son can light the funeral pyre of his parents while the daughter is barred from it.

• Sexuality was not a secret thing in Vedic period as it is evident from Hindu places of worship like Khajuraho, Ajanta, Ellora temples and scriptures like Kama Sutra and various other Hindu texts which openly spoke or showed pornography.

• Ashvamedha Yajna is a ritual performed by Queens (particularly by chief queen) for fertility and also to gain power in the kingdom. The Ashvamedha Yajna includes slaughtering the horse, then follows the  Queen’s intercourse with the horse, then the horse is cut into pieces and cooked.

Scriptures promoting Rape:

• Lord Krishna stole the clothes of women while they were bathing in the Yamuna river. He did so to tease them and for the pleasure of watching the beauty of their naked bodies. We hang miniature paintings of the same act in our homes proudly. The young men who grow up seeing this, or listening to the story told in an amused tone are bound to not find such an act abhorrent.

• Lord Shiva, who insisted on entering the bathing arena of Goddess Parvati and did so by killing a child who was keeping guard at the open door.

• We have gods who, for instance, have cut the nose and ear lobes of a woman who approached them professing her love (Lakshman is depicted as having done this to Shurpanakha), and yet we adore him and see him as a symbol of loyalty, sacrifice and righteous indignation.

• Sita became suspect in the eyes of Lord Rama and she was forced to commit suicide.

• Dropadi treated as commodity.

• That husband is her God of a wife.- Mahabharata Chapter 146 Anushasan Parv – Also Manusimrati has the same regulation for woman.

• Manu Smriti says: Never trust a woman. Never sit alone with a woman even if it may be your mother, she may tempt you. Do not sit alone with your daughter, she may tempt you. Do not sit alone with your sister, she may tempt you.

• Manu Smriti: “Na stree swadantriya marhathi”. “No liberty for women in society”.

• (Satapatha Brahmana 14:1:1:31) "but woman, the Sûdra, the dog, and the black bird (the crow), are untruth: he should not look at these, lest he should mingle excellence and sin, light and darkness, truth and untruth.”

• “Indra himself hath said, The mind of woman brooks not discipline, her intellect hath little weight.” -Rig Veda 8:33:17

• A wife which can't bear son be discarded - Satapatha Brahmana 5:3:1:13

• Don’t give liberty to women. They are not fit for independence -Manusmrti 9:2-4

• Commentary by Swami Shivananda, Rishikesh: "........Women and Sudras are debarred by social rules from the study of the Vedas. ...."

• From Tulsi Ramayana- Aranya Kanda, 5 A-B: Ansuya (Rishi Atri's wife) said to Sita: "A woman is impure by her very birth; but she attains a happy state by serving her lord (husband)".

• Valmiki Ramayana treats woman as slave to his husband.- various entries.

• "A woman who is separated from her husband cannot sustain her life." Ayodhaaya Kand - Valmiki Ramayana

• Devdasi Pratha – where the young girls were dedicated to temple lords and used by the powerful persons or kings who controlled the respective temple.

• Swami Dayanand in his book Satyarath Parkash on page 318 – Brahmin considered sex with shudra women equal to pilgrimage. Sex by Brahmin with a prostitute was also considered as pious.

• In Malabar Kerala when the king would marry a girl he would depute her to the priest's house for some nights. This practice was also witnessed by a European traveller (Voyages of Walthuma vol. 1, page14) as quoted by Sant Ram Visheshvaranand Hoshiarpur. 

• In olden days the kings would present young women to the temple priests. See the dialogue between the great dramatist Kalidas with his pupil Sampuran Aushapi. Here Kaladasa says that he eulogized the greek king Chandra Gupta and said that he belonged to the family of Raja Ram Chander of Ayudhia. The king was so pleased that he presented Kalidasa a girl with golden hair (obviously a european girl) (This is quoted by Rahul Sanskritayan in his book Volga to Ganga at page 232.

• A woman who has delivered baby is considered as impure by Hindus. Interestingly the span of impurity varies from caste to caste.

• A Hindu woman is supposed to fast during certain days of year for the benefit of her husband while there are no such fasts for husband to observe.

• Only the male Brahmin can be pujari at the temple. What to talk of doing the ritual the woman is not allowed to read the scripture.
Continue Reading | comments (2)

Kiran Bedi’s husband Brij Bedi passes away

Monday, 1 February 2016

Kiran Bedi’s husband Brij Bedi passes away

GURGAON, January 31, 2016
IANS

(Please also see Unhappy Husband of Kiran Bedi)

Brij Bedi, the husband of Kiran Bedi, India’s first woman IPS officer, died at a hospital in Gurgaon on Sunday after a brief illness, doctors said.

Brij Bedi was hospitalised on January 28 following kidney and breathing problems.

His condition deteriorated and he was shifted to the ICU. Doctors said he died around 11 am on Sunday.

A photographer and social activist, Brij Bedi ran a school in Amritsar for underprivileged children.

After his death, Kiran Bedi posted a series of tweets paying tributes to her husband.
"City of Amritsar lost a man who loved his city the most. One who gave all his life to the cause of the needy. We will carry (forward) his service.
"He loved his city, Amritsar. Worked passionately to make it better. He educated children of fathers lost to drugs.
"He was very concerned about the problem of drug addiction in Punjab. He was a courageous voice for several causes."
Once a part of social activist Anna Hazare`s team, Kiran Bedi was the chief ministerial face of the Bharatiya Janata Party in the 2015 Delhi assembly elections.

courtesy:
http://www.thehindu.com/
---------------------------------------
Continue Reading | comments

AKAL TAKHAT PANJ PIARAS DISTINCT FROM STREET PYARAS

Tuesday, 5 January 2016

AKAL TAKHAT PANJ PIARAS DISTINCT FROM STREET PYARAS

Where ever the Guru lived that place became the headquarter of Sikhs.  The first such Centre was Kartarpur sahib (Ravi). Later it got shifted to Khadoor sahib then Goindwal sahib,  Ramdaspur (Amritsar) and then Anandpur sahib.
During the days of Nanak the VI, need of a place was felt where the Sikhs could gather to discuss political, social and miscellaneous issues that confronted the Sikh society from time to time. The Guru thus raised a building which was later came to be known as Akal Takhat i.e the centre of Miri the political power while Harmander the Golden Temple the centre of piri the  spiritualism was already there.

After the Tenth Guru bestowed guruship on Granth sahib Amritsar became the headquarter or capital of Sikhism again because the Granth sahib stood already ceremoniously installed by the V Guru. Mind it in the absence of printing press there were few beeds the copies of the holy book available.
  Guru Granth the holy book is to be interpreted by Beloved Five the Panj Pyaras. Thus advice of Gurbani interpreted by Panj Pyaras who have offered their head to Panth and who are regularly in touch with Gurbani to keep their five evils of kam, krodh, lobh, moh and ahankar i.e the urge of sex, anger, greed, attachment and pride (collectively known as 'haumen' the ego) under check. (Sikhism believes that if a person eradicates his haumen the ego he stands merged with formless God.)
Making arrangements for future the Tenth Master would often give training to Sikhs as to how to confront the days to day issues. He made Panj Pyaras as supreme power. There are examples when Guru was himself penalized (awarded tankhah) by Panj Pyaras.
There are examples in history how the Sikh emperor Maharaja Ranjit Singh was punished by Panj Pyaras led by Akali Phoola Singh. We would here in after call the Panj Piaras of Akal Takhat the Real Panj Piaras or RPP for convenience and distinction.
In an effort to redefine their territory the greedy and over enthusiast politicians in the post 1947  years changed the constitution of Panj Pyara and included such granthis  from other far flung Indian places like Patna Sahib in Bihar, Hajur Sahib in Maharashtra and Anandpur sahib and Dam Dama sahib. They believed as if Akal Takhat Panj Pyaras had no powers beyond Amritsar while according to tradition the Akal Takhat Panj Pyaras were the real panch pardhan of entire Sikh nation. The Sikhs didn't object to the new constitution.  For convenience we will call them Political Panj Piaras (PPP).
Slowly such granthis came to be appointed as PPP who were considered faithful to the person who had control over the SGPC the Sikh elected body for management of historical Sikh shrines. Yet the order of PPP were faithfully obeyed by the Sikh nation. Will any body believe that influential quarters got person like Darshan Singh Ragi appointed to the PPP who is now openly opposing the Sikh concepts. Some Sikhs had objected to his nomination for they knew that Ragi was under influence of Govt of India.
India believed that this institution of Panj Pyaras was a parallel power-centre within India beyond Delhi. Also they believed that SGPC was a parallel Parliament. These two institutions thus became an eye sore for Delhi. India thus adopted a secret programme to first dilute these power centres and then finally finish them.
They first found a helping hand in Gurcharan Singh Tohra the head of SGPC. The democratic character was first annihilated. The Govt avoided annual elections of SGPC for 27 years to keep Tohra in saddle. Even those elected in the last term were not allowed to meet. Tohra would invite the general assembly once a year for an hour just to get Executive body nominated. Yet the Sikh nation tolerated it and obeyed the directive whenever it was issued. Through Tohra the Govt managed to get its own Jathedar appointed to the holy team of PPP.
But Tohra was a clever politician. Many a times the Govt might have wanted to give final blow to finish SGPC but Tohra managed to get it postponed every time. Similarly when the Congress was in power in Punjab they would use their influence to avoid that harsh blow in view of electoral reasons.
Around 2000 the Govt agencies through RSS created an organization on papers called Sehajdhari Federation. A case in High Court was filed seeking voting rights for such Sikhs who would not necessarily have intact hair and turban. The real idea was to get voting rights for non-Sikhs read Hindus. So that these institutions are finished and separate identity of Sikhs annihilated. The RSS had already got its secret supporters appointed in the SGPC executive. It appears that RSS made them agree to put forth a weak defence in the court so that the Sehajdhari could win. And it so happened. A case was also filed that the press be prevented to highlight this issue. They gave the plea that otherwise it would give impetus to separatism and thus militancy.  The old house was asked to manage the SGPC as a caretaker body.
Notwithstanding, in Sept. 2011 the Govt held election to constitute SGPC. The results were announced but the Govt refused to issue notification to constitute the house in view of the court verdict.
The SGPC technically appealed to the Supreme Court. The present head would naturally not wish that the verdict comes soon and it takes years in Supreme Court if both the parties are willing to delay the verdict. Thus democratic character of SGPC is finished.
CM Badal who is only faithful to his chair,family and RSS asked the elected members of SGPC to keep mum on the issue. As a result of which non of its about 190 members ever opened his mouth on non recognition of elected members. To keep them happy  they were allotted one or two shrines to interfere in their management without any written order. It thus amounts to bribe to silence an elected member. And it is going on since 2011. Thus the elected members have been made irrelevant. Now the ground is cleared to make the SGPC a board where the members would be nominated by Govt instead of election by Sikh sangat. So SGPC is finished.
But before it is finished formally the RSS got its one of the members appointed as the next head after President of SGPC. That too at a very high record salary.
The next institution on target was Panj Piaras (PPP). Quite often the Govt through its influences got damaging and sometimes non-sense hukamnamas the promulgations issued. Will any Sikh believe that the Panj Piaras not once but twice thrice issued firman that no new gurdwara be established. As a result of which the Akali leaders even started laying foundation stones of churches. As a matter of fact the Panj Piaras are the conscience of Sikh Sangat the congregation engaged in Naam the praises to God. Thus the order issued by Panj Piaras is considered as the order of Sangat. Naturally the Piaras are supposed to issue verdict on such issue which are widely debated upon in the sikh masses.
With BJP at the Centre and obedient Akali Govt in the state, the agencies became furious. May be they believed 'now or never'.
Already head of a Sikh sect at Sirsa had openly defied Sikhism to please RSS so that he can save himself from the criminal cases he was facing. There are about 6 murder cases, some rape cases and one case where some resident youth of the Dera were got sterile through surgery. The Sikhs always take any attack on humanity as an attack on Sikhism. Thus open confrontation started between the dera followers and Sikhs.
For RSS Now was the right time to act. It planned a strategy.
A hukamnama was got issued by the PPP exonerating the dera head. There was thus open resentment by the Sikhs against such a hukamnama.
Hukamnama issued against establishment of
a new Gurdwara. Here the Jathedars falsely
claim that the issue has been debated upon.
This is one example how unjustified firman were
got issued through PPP the political Panj
piaras.
Giving fuel to the fire, at various places the Sikh holy book Guru Granth sahib was got desecrated in phased and planned manner. It was got done in such a manner that gave the impression that the Dera was behind this. Police could nab some men who did this crime but refused to go to the root of it. The senior officers like the SSPs would themselves intervene in the cases and stop further investigation.
The Sikh nation thus protested at the hukamnama issued by PPP and the wide spread resentment pricked the conscience of the real Panj Pyaras of Akal Takhat (RPP). They issued a hukamnama on Oct. 20, 2015 asking the SGPC to relieve PPP who had issued a firman in favour of Sirsa Dera Head. It is suspected may be some vested interests persuaded the otherwise dormant RPP to act to create confusion.
The SGPC thus suspended them because it was a challenge to the PPP who were used by SGPC many a times before. Also it was well known that the PPP would issue hukamnama on the orders from political bosses. Thus the political boss will try to defend them to any extent. Due to protests by Sikh masses the SGPC reinstated the RPP.
But again the RPP issued a hukamnama asking the authorities to relieve the PPP members by Dec. 31. 2015 or else RPP would issue further directive. The SGPC immediately dismissed the services of RPP members.
SGPC head Avtar Singh Makkarh and Sukhbir Badal issued statements that SGPC head is qualified to sack the RPP. Sukhbir even issued a statement that Piaras like RPP are there in every street gurdwara whose power is only to administer pahul 'Amrit Chhakauna'. We therefore humbly say that the Panj Piaras from the axis of Sikhism are different from village/street Panj Piaras. Also those engaged in administration of Pahul, who recite gurbani before any verdict are the real panch pardhan as compared to PPP who would issue hukamnamas at the instance of politicians. Thus SGPC has no power or right to sack RPP under such circumstances. Besides the present body of SGPC is a care taker one and not elected one. It absolutely has no right to interfere in such issues which pertain to interpretation of basic Sikh tenets. We also wish to convey that even the gali/mohalla/village Panj Piaras are no less important if they act accordance to Gurbani and wishes of sangat engaged in naam.


Please leave your comment below.


  
Continue Reading | comments

Sikhs a Minority in Punjab in 34 years we wrote 8 years ago

Wednesday, 23 September 2015

Sikhs  a Minority in Punjab in 34 years we wrote 8 years ago

Here is what we noticed on internet. The scholars were discussing on demography predicting how Sikhs r going to be a minority.. Unfortunately despite census results out no Sikh of note has taken notice of this impending danger. I reproduce my 2007 post on yahoogroups.




2173    Sikhs will be a Minority in Punjab in 34 years- Census figures - TOI
Expand Messages
B.S.GorayaJan 30, 2007
"If Naidu does need some impending demographic
imbalance to worry about, there is a more proximate
candidate available. The Sikh population in Punjab
grew by 14.3 per cent between 1991 and 2001; the Hindu
population of the state grew by 28.7 per cent over the
same period. In 2001, Sikhs constituted just under 60
per cent of the state's population while Hindus
constituted about 37 per cent. If both groups maintain
their current growth rates, Punjab will have as many
Hindus as Sikhs by 2041, just about 37 years from now.
Isn't it interesting that this particular demographic
shift does not seem to bother Naidu or his partymen?
Perhaps while all demographic shifts are equal, some
are more equal than others.”


Sorry, Wrong Number: Venkaiah Naidu And The 247-Year
Hitch
By Shankar Raghuraman
11 September, 2004
Times Of India
BJP president Venkaiah Naidu says the differential
growth rates for Hindu and Muslim populations in India
are a matter of "grave concern" for those bothered
about the country's unity and integrity. The
"imbalance", he suggests, raises "serious questions of
a long-term nature" when seen in conjunction with the
phenomenon of Bangladeshi infiltrators. To most normal
people, pseudo-secular as they are, it does not
automatically follow that if Muslims grow faster than
Hindus national unity is imperilled or that more
Indian Muslims being born is akin to infiltration from
across the eastern borders. But, then, such
connections are not only obvious but axiomatic to
those bred on the sangh parivar's ideology,
particularly on its cruder manifestations.
The paranoia that Hindus will one day be reduced to a
minority in India is neither new nor exclusive to
Naidu. It is as old as his ideological fraternity and
as widely shared. It is time perhaps to offer them
some statistical comfort. After making the necessary
adjustments to the Census data on religious groups
released a few days ago, it turns out that the Muslim
population has grown by 29.3 per cent over the last
decade, while the Hindu population has grown by 19.9
per cent.
Guess how long it would take, if these growth rates
were maintained, for Muslims to outnumber Hindus in
India. It's not a matter of a few years or even a few
decades. We would have to wait till the 2251 Census
for that to happen. That's about 247 years from where
we are located in time. Naidu can, therefore, exit
panic mode. In fact, he can do even better. He can
start celebrating. For, if Indian Hindus and Muslims
continued to grow at the current rates till the year
2251, their combined population by that date would be
about 158 billion. Since that's about 30 times the
current population of planet Earth, we would then
unquestionably rule the world, which is by all
accounts unlikely to come even close to matching such
growth over two and a half centuries.
If Naidu does need some impending demographic
imbalance to worry about, there is a more proximate
candidate available. The Sikh population in Punjab
grew by 14.3 per cent between 1991 and 2001; the Hindu
population of the state grew by 28.7 per cent over the
same period. In 2001, Sikhs constituted just under 60
per cent of the state's population while Hindus
constituted about 37 per cent. If both groups maintain
their current growth rates, Punjab will have as many
Hindus as Sikhs by 2041, just about 37 years from now.
Isn't it interesting that this particular demographic
shift does not seem to bother Naidu or his partymen?
Perhaps while all demographic shifts are equal, some
are more equal than others.
Has the BJP noticed that neither the Akalis nor anyone
else in Punjab is getting worked up about demographic
"imbalances" or perceiving them as threats to Punjab's
unity? If they have, they might ask themselves why
this is the case. Could it be that unlike Naidu the
average Punjabi, Sikh or otherwise, recognises that
numbers do not make communities more or less powerful?
If the BJP were to bother to study history it could
reach that conclusion on its own. The upper castes
have dominated Indian society, politics, industry...
not because they outnumber the rest. But, of course,
the sangh parivar is not much of a votary for studying
history. Itbelieves that making up your own history as
you go along is a rather more rewarding occupation,
apart from being more creatively satisfying.
But it could still look at the very demographic trends
it is so concerned about. If it is really true that
having larger numbers is an advantage, why is every
community moving in the other direction? Why are
growth rates coming down, not going up? Even more
importantly, it is surely no coincidence that as we
move up the socio-economic ladder, we find the growth
rate coming down. Thus, the more developed states tend
to have lower growth rates, communities with smaller
numbers of the socio-economically deprived again have
lower growth rates than those that have few people
among the privileged.
There may be temporary movements away from this trend,
but the long-term progress towards lower growth rates
is secular and across the religious spectrum. If Naidu
feels this trend needs to be accelerated, there are
simpler ways of achieving the goal than striving for a
uniform growth rate across communities.
Kerala has some pointers to offer on this score. The
prescription is obvious — raise literacy, particularly
female literacy, enhance economic growth and
distributive justice, make basic health facilities
accessible to all. Population stabilisation will
follow, not because the state mandates it as a goal,
but because it becomes rational for indivi-duals to
optimise the size of their families.
>From the BJP's point of view, however, there is a
serious problem with this pres-cription. It might
settle the demographic problem that the party is so
worked up about, but it will also in the process leave
no room for a paranoia that has served its political
cause rather well for decades.
That is a problem, of course, but luckily for the rest
of us, it is one that the sangh parivar has to
confront, not one that affects pseudo-secular Indians
like us. It certainly isn't one that threatens the
country's unity and integrity or pose serious
questions of a long-term nature that would have us
losing our sleep over them. Sorry Naidu, you're on
your own on this one.

B.S.Goraya
Editor/Moderator:-
Punjab Monitor Magazine
www.punjabmonitor.com
Continue Reading | comments (2)

NO WE AREN'T HINDUS - HUM HINDU NAHI

Sunday, 26 July 2015

NO WE AREN'T HINDUS - HUM HINDU NAHI

English rendering of edited book Hum Hindu Nahi by the famous Sikh Bhai Kahn Singh Nabha


(Published Oct 200)








Continue Reading | comments

OUT TO DEMOLISH SIKH ANTIQUITY - KAR SEWA BABA

OUT TO DEMOLISH SIKH ANTIQUITY - KAR SEWA BABA

(published Oct 2000)

Continue Reading | comments

MYTH OF INDIAN SECULARISM EXPLODED

MYTH OF INDIAN SECULARISM EXPLODED
Review of Chakravyuh of Gurtej Singh IAS
(Publishded Oct. 2000)








Continue Reading | comments

RSS LAUNCH FINAL ASSAULT - TO ABSORB SIKHS INTO HINDUISM

RSS LAUNCH FINAL ASSAULT - TO

ABSORB SIKHS INTO HINDUISM

(Published Oct 200)

Continue Reading | comments

MUSLIM DEVOTEES OF GURU GOBIND SINGH

MUSLIM DEVOTEES OF GURU GOBIND SINGH 
(published Oct 2000)

Continue Reading | comments

VADH BACHEY

What's New?

Issue 8

Issue xix

 

Punjab Monitor